Weed Management Using Bambusa Leaf Litter Mulch in Sweet Corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/seas.10.1.14639.56-66Keywords:
Decomposition of mulch, Germination of weed seeds, Soil microorganisms, seed bank, Weed seed dormancyAbstract
The issue of weed competition becomes increasingly critical in sweet corn cultivation when weeds are not controlled during the early stages of crop growth. This study aimed to determine the appropriate application rate of bamboo leaf litter mulch for effective weed suppression while simultaneously enhancing the growth and yield of sweet corn. The experiment was conducted within the experimental area of the Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gunung Leuser, Kutacane, Aceh Province, Indonesia. The experiment was arranged using a non-factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) consisting of three treatment and three replications. The treatments were defined as D0=0, D1=2, D2=4 kg m?¹ of bamboo leaf litter mulch, which correspond to 0, 20, 40 t ha?¹, respectively. The observed variables included weed control percentage, weed cover, number of weed species, weed population density, and fresh weed biomass. Crop growth parameters were also recorded, including plant height, stem circumference, and number of leaves at 10, 20, 30, and 40 DAP. Yield-related parameters consisted of ear diameter, ear length, ear weight, kernel weight, and dry shelled grain yield. Application of bamboo leaf litter mulch at 20 t ha?¹ effectively enhanced weed control percentage at 10 and 20 DAP, while reducing weed cover percentage at 10, 20, and 30 DAP, as well as decreasing weed fresh weight at 20 DAP. Furthermore, this treatment promoted sweet corn growth by increasing plant height at 20 and 40 DAP, leaf number at 30 DAP, and improving cob length, cob weight, and grain yield of sweet corn.
References
[1] S. Safrina, B. Baidhawi, and H. Hafifah, “Determination of The Critical Period of Sweet Corn Plants (Zea Mays Saccharata Sturt) Against Weed,” Int. J. Eng. Scie. and Inform. Technology., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 41–46, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v4i3.524.
[2] M. Sepe, S. Suhardi, and H. O. Rosa, “Periode Kritis Kompetisi Tanaman Jagung Varietas Hibrida Terhadap Gulma,” agrovital, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 87, May 2024, doi: 10.35329/agrovital.v9i1.3851.
[3] P. Dey and T. Pratap, “Variations in morpho-physiological traits of sweet corn in response to weed management,” Ind. Jour. Weed Scie., vol. 50, no. 4, p. 365, 2018, doi: 10.5958/0974-8164.2018.00077.1.
[4] S. Korav, A. K. Dhaka, R. Singh, P. N, and G. C. Reddy, “A study on crop weed competition in field crops,” J Pharmacogn Phytochem, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 3235–3240, Aug. 2018.
[5] R. K. Rathod, V. P. Bhalerao, P. B. Margal, and B. M. Kamble, “Soil Microflora as Influenced by Pre and Post Emergence Herbicide in Sweet Corn Grown in Vertisols,” Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci, vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 2794–2801, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.323.
[6] C. D. M. Freitas, J. D. P. Pamplona, H. A. Lins, M. D. F. Souza, J. L. D. Dombroski, and D. V. Silva, “Gaseous exchanges of corn and weeds under competition and water regimes,” Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 465–473, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v24n7p465-473.
[7] I. K. Ngawit and M. T. Fauzi, “Periode Kritis Jagung Manis Berkompetisidengan Gulma pada Entisol Lombok Tengah,” 1, vol. 3, pp. 36–47, Jan. 2021.
[8] A. Hussen, “Effect of Critical Period of Weed Competition and Its Management Option in Sweet Corn [Zea mays (L.) var. saccharata strut] Production: A Review,” AG, no. Of, May 2021, doi: 10.18805/ag.R-189.
[9] D. Massa, S. Benvenuti, S. Cacini, S. Lazzereschi, and G. Burchi, “Effect of hydro-compacting organic mulch on weed control and crop performance in the cultivation of three container-grown ornamental shrubs: Old solutions meet new insights,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 252, pp. 260–267, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.03.053.
[10] C. Chirilli, A. Biafora, A. Giaccardi, S. Benedettelli, and P. Migliorini, “Impact of Different Agroecological Practices for Weed Management on Weeds and Crops Development,” Agronomy, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 2335, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.3390/agronomy15102335.
[11] A. Mairata et al., “The organic mulches in vineyards exerted an influence on spontaneous weed cover and plant biodiversity,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 151, p. 126997, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126997.
[12] D. Singh and T. Chamroy, “Impact of Organic Mulching on Weed Suppression, Soil Moisture Conservation and Yield in Vegetable Crops: A Comprehensive Review,” J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 681–697, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i42227.
[13] M. Pardo-Muras, C. G. Puig, and N. Pedrol, “Complex Synergistic Interactions among Volatile and Phenolic Compounds Underlie the Effectiveness of Allelopathic Residues Added to the Soil for Weed Control,” Plants, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 1114, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/plants11091114.
[14] K. Šoln, M. Klemen?i?, and J. D. Koce, “Plant cell responses to allelopathy: from oxidative stress to programmed cell death,” Protoplasma, vol. 259, no. 5, pp. 1111–1124, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00709-021-01729-8.
[15] C. S. Choudhary et al., “Mechanisms of allelopathic interactions for sustainable weed management,” Rhizosphere, vol. 25, p. 100667, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2023.100667.
[16] C. Cabrera-Pérez, F. Valencia-Gredilla, A. Royo-Esnal, and J. Recasens, “Organic Mulches as an Alternative to Conventional Under-Vine Weed Management in Mediterranean Irrigated Vineyards,” Plants, vol. 11, no. 20, p. 2785, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/plants11202785.
[17] C. Cabrera-Pérez, J. Llorens, A. Escolà, A. Royo-Esnal, and J. Recasens, “Organic mulches as an alternative for under-vine weed management in Mediterranean irrigated vineyards: Impact on agronomic performance,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 145, p. 126798, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126798.
[18] A. Scavo and G. Mauromicale, “Crop Allelopathy for Sustainable Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Knowing the Present with a View to the Future,” Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 2104, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112104.
[19] H. Wang, K. Zhao, X. Li, X. Chen, W. Liu, and J. Wang, “Factors affecting seed germination and emergence of Aegilops tauschii,” Weed Research, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 171–181, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1111/wre.12410.
[20] W. Tang et al., “Germination ecology of Chenopodium album L. and implications for weed management,” PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no. 10, p. e0276176, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276176.
[21] M. Fernando and A. Shrestha, “The Potential of Cover Crops for Weed Management: A Sole Tool or Component of an Integrated Weed Management System?,” Plants, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 752, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/plants12040752.
[22] R. Iqbal et al., “Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches—a review,” Bull Natl Res Cent, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 75, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s42269-020-00290-3.
[23] C. Halde and M. H. Entz, “Plant species and mulch application rate affected decomposition of cover crop mulches used in organic rotational no-till systems,” Can. J. Plant Sci., vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 59–71, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1139/cjps-2015-0095.
[24] L. Sitinjak and J. L. Butar-butar, “Efektifitas berbagai mulsa dan ketebalan dalam menekan pertumbuhan gulma teki-tekian (Cyperus rotundus l.) Pada budidaya bawang merah (Allium cepa L),” agroteknosains, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 51, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.36764/ja.v5i1.545.
[25] A. M. D. Oliveira, P. A. B. Barreto-Garcia, A. B. D. Novaes, F. F. D. Carvalho, and I. E. D. S. Meireles, “Decomposição da serapilheira foliar em plantios de bambu, nim indiano e eucalipto,” Ciênc. Florest., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 845–855, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.5902/1980509838190.
[26] D. S. Akoto et al., “Comparative analysis of leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns of bamboo and traditional species in agroforestry system in Ghana,” Cleaner Materials, vol. 4, p. 100068, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.clema.2022.100068.
[27] B. Bourgeois et al., “What makes a weed a weed? A large?scale evaluation of arable weeds through a functional lens,” American J of Botany, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 90–100, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1213.
[28] S. Eljebri, M. Bouskout, L. Ouahmane, Z. Abdelmajid, and T. Rachid, “Floristic diversity and ecological characteristics of weeds in irrigated agro-system with a Mediterranean climate,” Vegetos, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 883–899, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s42535-024-00834-2.
[29] L. M. Schwartz-Lazaro and J. T. Copes, “A Review of the Soil Seedbank from a Weed Scientists Perspective,” Agronomy, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 369, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.3390/agronomy9070369.
[30] G. Song et al., “Seasonal dynamics of seed dormancy and germination in the weed Diplachne fusca,” PeerJ, vol. 12, p. e17987, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.7717/peerj.17987.
[31] A. Ramut, Agronomi Sistemik Pertanian Berkelanjutan Sebagai Fondasi Ketahanan Pangan. Yayasan Putra Adi Dharma, 2025. Accessed: Mar. 08, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ypad.store/product/agronomi-sistemik-pertanian-berkelanjutan-sebagai-fondasi-ketahanan-pangan/
[32] L. D. Cahyanti, K. Jadid, A. A. A. Azis, and N. Alam, “Pemanfaatan Seresah Daun Bambu (Dendrocalamus asper) Sebagai Bioherbisida Pengendali Gulma Yang Ramah Lingkungan,” G.Agr.Sci.J, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.21111/agrotech.v2i1.293.
[33] A. Ramut, “Aplikasi herbisida oxyfluorfen dan pendimethalin bervariasi dosis dalam mengendalikan gulma pada tanaman kedelai,” Universitas Syiah Kuala, 2021. Accessed: Sep. 30, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://etd.usk.ac.id/https//etd.usk.ac.id
[34] A. Ramut et al., “Weed Control by Different Doses Flumioxazin Herbicide in Soybean,” SEAS (Sustainable Environment Agricultural Science), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 138–145, Oct. 2025.
[35] S. Kaur, R. Kaur, and B. S. Chauhan, “Understanding crop-weed-fertilizer-water interactions and their implications for weed management in agricultural systems,” Crop Protection, vol. 103, pp. 65–72, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.09.011.
[36] N. G. Little, A. DiTommaso, A. S. Westbrook, Q. M. Ketterings, and C. L. Mohler, “Effects of fertility amendments on weed growth and weed–crop competition: a review,” Weed Sci, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 132–146, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1017/wsc.2021.1.
[37] M. Orrego, A. Katayama, M. Hasegawa, and T. Enoki, “Dead bamboo culms promote litter mass, carbon and nitrogen loss, but do not modulate the effect of soil fauna on litter decomposition,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 117, p. 103493, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2023.103493.
[38] A. Ramut, Hasanuddin, and S. Hafsah, “The Growth of Soybean Plant Due To the Application of Various Dosages of Oxyfluorfen and Pendimethalin Herbicide,” IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 34–37, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.9790/2380-1312033437.
[39] L. Fan et al., “Effect of Various Mulch Materials on Chemical Properties of Soil, Leaves and Shoot Characteristics in Dendrocalamus Latiflorus Munro Forests,” Plants, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 2302, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/plants10112302.
[40] A. R. C. Yuwana, R. Jumadi, and S. R. Endah, “Differences in the Types of mulch and varieties on the growth and result of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.),” JAP, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 103–112, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.58466/jap.v2i1.1357.
[41] A. Ramut et al., “Sustainable Weed Management Using Chromolaena odorata Organic Mulch Improves Soybean Productivity,” SEAS: Sust. Envir. Agric. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 154–160, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.22225/seas.9.2.13462.154-160.
[42] Q. Teng et al., “Litterfall quality modulates soil ammonium and nitrate supply through altering microbial function in bamboo encroachment of broadleaf forests,” Geoderma, vol. 437, p. 116592, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116592.
[43] B. Chen et al., “Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis Revealing the Genes Related to Sugar Metabolism in Kernels of Sweet Corn,” Metabolites, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 1254, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/metabo12121254.
[44] Y. Hryhoriv et al., “Growth and Development of Sweet Corn Plants in the Agro–Ecological Conditions of the Western Region of Ukraine,” Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 216–222, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.12912/27197050/162699.
[45] D. Ye et al., “Nitrogen-mediated coordination of photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism enhances sweet corn yield and quality,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 229, p. 110776, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110776.
[46] C. Chandrakar, J. Dawson, and D. Choudhary, “Effect of Phosphorus and Potassium on Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.),” IJPSS, vol. 35, no. 18, pp. 1207–1213, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i183386.
[47] Y. Sun, Y. Han, Z. Xu, J. Zhang, J. Shen, and L. Cheng, “Phosphorus partitioning contribute to phosphorus use efficiency during grain filling in Zea mays,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 14, p. 1223532, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1223532.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



