The Effectiveness of Pruning and Atonic in Improving the Reproductive Development of Coffee Plants

Authors

  • Ni Luh Putu Sulis Dewi Damayanti Agrotechnology Department, Faculty of Agricultural, Science and Technology, Warmadewa University
  • I Gusti Bagus Udayana Agrotechnology Department, Faculty of Agricultural, Science and Technology, Warmadewa University
  • Yohanes Parlindungan Situmeang Agrotechnology Department, Faculty of Agricultural, Science and Technology, Warmadewa University
  • Ni Kadek Desy Andya Dewi Agrotechnology Department, Faculty of Agricultural, Science and Technology, Warmadewa University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/seas.10.1.14303.13-19

Keywords:

Coffee, pruning, plant growth regulator, Atonic, reproductive development

Abstract

Decline in Arabica coffee productivity in the Kintamani highlands indicates agronomic constraints affecting the plant's reproductive phase. Pruning and the application of growth regulators are two essential approaches to improving the physiological balance that supports flower and fruit formation. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of pruning and Atonik application in promoting shoot, leaf, flower, and fruit-bud growth in Arabica coffee plants. The study was conducted over 12 weeks using a factorial design with a combination of pruning treatments and several Atonik dosage levels. Data were analysed using ANOVA and follow-up tests to determine the differences between treatments. The results showed that pruning consistently increased shoot regeneration and improved canopy structure, thereby optimising light capture efficiency and photosynthetic product distribution. The Atonik application strengthened the plants' physiological response by increasing meristem activity and nutrient absorption. The combination of both treatments produced the highest number of flowers and fruit buds compared to either treatment alone. Scientifically, these findings indicate that the enhancement of the generative phase is highly dependent on vegetative conditions, which are strengthened by canopy management and hormonal stimulation. This study makes an essential contribution to the development of coffee cultivation strategies that integrate pruning practices and hormone regulation to sustainably increase productivity.

References

[1] Hanan, A. Anhar, Y. Abubakar, and A. Karim, “Arabica coffee yields at various harvest seasons and altitudes in the Gayo Highlands, Aceh,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2024. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1297/1/012001.

[2] H.Gebreselassie, B. Tesfaye, A. Gedebo, and K. Tolessa, “Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis using AMMI and GGE-biplot models for yield of Arabica coffee genotypes in south Ethiopia,” J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 65 – 77, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12892-023-00213-4.

[3] M. H. K. Al-Musawi, “Effect of Growth Regulator (ATONIC) and Zn-Nano-Fertilizer on Sweet Pepper ( Capsicum Annuum L.),” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2023. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1259/1/012059.

[4] B. C. Ferreira, S. F. De Lima, C. A. Simon, M. G. de O. Andrade, J. de Ávila, and R. de C. F. Alvarez, “Effect of biostimulant and micronutrient on emergence, growth and quality of Arabica coffee seedlings; [Efeito de bioestimulante e micronutriente na emergência, crescimento e qualidade de mudas de café Arábica],” Coffee Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 324 – 332, 2018, doi: 10.25186/cs.v13i3.1450.

[5] W. Wadas and T. Dziugie?, “Changes in assimilation area and chlorophyll content of very early potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars as influenced by biostimulants,” Agronomy, vol. 10, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.3390/agronomy10030387.

[6] D. C. Baitelle, A. C. V. Filho, S. de J. Freitas, G. B. Miranda, H. D. Vieira, and K. M. Vieira, “Cycle pruning programmed on the grain yield of arabica coffee; [Poda programada de ciclo na produtividade do cafeeiro arábica],” Cienc. e Agrotecnologia, vol. 43, 2019, doi: 10.1590/1413-7054201943014419.

[7] N. Gokavi, K. Mote, M. Jayakumar, Y. Raghuramulu, and U. Surendran, “The effect of modified pruning and planting systems on growth, yield, labour use efficiency and economics of Arabica coffee,” Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam)., vol. 276, no. September 2020, p. 109764, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109764.

[8] D. Ghosh et al., “The combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers influence the weed growth, productivity and soil fertility of monsoon rice,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 1 January, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262586.

[9] M. N. Azizu, N. Nasaruddin, S. Salengke, and A. Rosmana, “Increasing The C/N Ratio of Coffee Leaves Through Appropriate Pruning Techniques to Support Kaongkeongkea Coffee Production,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, R. R., Ed., American Institute of Physics, 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0224059.

[10] M. E. P. da C. Jaeggi et al., “Path Analysis of Vegetative Characteristics in Conilon Coffee Production Consortiated with Green Fertilizers in Tropical Climate,” J. Exp. Agric. Int., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.9734/jeai/2019/v40i230361.

[11] M. Rako?evi?, E. R. Batista, F. T. Matsunaga, and M. B. dos S. Scholz, “Plant Growth Regulators and Short-Term Irrigation for Berry Maturation Homogeneity and Increased Coffea arabica Bean Quality,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 9, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17093803.

[12] R. S. S. Al-Dulaimi and A. T. Homed, “Effects of Typical Pollination Methods, Spraying of Sorbitol and Atonic-Containing Pollen Suspension on Some Fruits characteristics of the Date Palm Cv. Maktoom and Braim,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, A. S.M. and M. T.T., Eds., Institute of Physics, 2025. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1449/1/012139.

[13] S. S. Khalajabadi, V. C. D. Poveda, and J. R. R. Sáenz, “Coffee productive branch growth, development and nutrient accumulation from flowering to harvest under Colombian conditions,” Coffee Sci., vol. 20, 2025, doi: 10.25186/.v20i.2274.

[14] M. Tajuddin, E. Santosa, D. Sopandie, and A. P. Lontoh, “Characteristics of growth, flowering and corm yield of iles-iles (Amorphophallus muelleri) genotypes at third growing period,” Biodiversitas, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 570–577, 2020, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d210219.

[15] M. T. Masarirambi, V. D. Shongwe, and V. Chingwara, “The effect of GA3 and ethephon on synchronization of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) flowering and berry ripening,” Acta Hortic., vol. 884, pp. 573 – 580, 2010, doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.884.74.

[16] T. Sarzynski et al., “Genetic-environment interactions and climatic variables effect on bean physical characteristics and chemical composition of Coffea arabica,” J. Sci. Food Agric., vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 4692 – 4703, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12544.

[17] L. M. Azevedo et al., “Hormonal crosstalk during the reproductive stage of Coffea arabica: interactions among gibberellin, abscisic acid, and ethylene,” Planta, vol. 261, no. 5, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04679-0.

[18] Rako?evi? M, Batista ER, Matsunaga FT, Scholz MBS. Plant growth regulators and short-term irrigation for berry maturation homogeneity and increased Coffea arabica bean quality. Sustain. 2025;17(9):3803. doi:10.3390/su17093803

[19] Khalajabadi SS, Poveda VCD, Sáenz JRR. Coffee productive branch growth, development and nutrient accumulation from flowering to harvest under Colombian conditions. Coffee Sci. 2025;20:e2274. doi:10.25186/cs.v20i.2274

[20] Damayanti NLPSD, Udayana IGB, Situmeang YP. Arabica coffee plant response to atonic concentration and production pruning. Sustain Environ Agric Sci. 2022;6(1):10–15.

[21] Azevedo LM, et al. Hormonal crosstalk during the reproductive stage of Coffea arabica: interactions among gibberellin, abscisic acid, and ethylene. Planta. 2025;261(5):1–15. doi:10.1007/s00425-025-04679-0

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles