Speech Acts Variation in Social Media Instagram @punapibali

  • Putu Nindhya Nirmala Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali – Indonesia
  • I Nyoman Kardana Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali – Indonesia
  • Agus Darma Yoga Pratama Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali – Indonesia
Keywords: Functions of speech act, Social media, Types of speech act

Abstract

This research aims to examine the speech act functions found on Instagram @punapibali and describe the types of speech acts used by the informant and news writer. Thus, this study was conducted using the qualitative descriptive method and by using the pragmatics fundamentals proposed by Wijana (1996) and the speech act function theory of Searle (1979) as the basis for examining the speech act functions used by the informant and news writer according to its type. The data were collected through the observation method accompanied by an act of scrutinizing speeches and sentences of the informant and news writer @punapibali. The oral data were collected from the conversations use to know the intonation and tone of the speech delivered. The data analysis results are presented descriptively. The results of data analysis showed there are 40 types of speech acts used in the caption of Instagram @punapibali. The expressive function is manifested in the act of asking for an apology, thanking someone, and congratulating someone. The directive function includes the act of asking, suggesting, advising, and urging. The commissive function includes expressing abilities and promising. The assertive function includes notifying, affirming, and stating. The declarative function is manifested in the act of declaration.   

References

Anwari. 2017. Linguistika, september 2017. Linguistika, Universitas Udayana, 24(47), 203–220.

Austin, J. 1962. Austin J. L. -How to Do Things With Words.pdf.

Fatmayanti. 2017. Fatmayanti. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 4, 9–15.

Holmes, J. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Pearson Education Limited, Essex.

Hudson, R.A. 1980. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge Univesity Press.

Katamba, F. 1993. Morphology. Macmillan Press Ltd, London.

Keraf, G. 1991. Tata Bahasa Rujukan Bahasa Indonesia. PT. Grasindo, Jakarta.

Lakoff, R.T. 1973. The Logic of Politeness, or Minding Your P's and Q's. Vol. 9, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

Nababan, P.W.J. 1984. Sosiolinguistik Suatu Pengantar. PT Gramedia, Jakarta.

Nuramila. 2017. Tindak Tutur Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Unggahan Media Sosial Instagram @Liputan6 (Kajian Pragmatik). Universitas Negeri Makasar, 6(c).

Searle, J. R. 1979. Studies in the theory of speech acts. In Cambridge University Press. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dhf27-nv7pkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=EXPRESSION+AND+MEANING+Studies+in+the+Theory+of+Speech+Acts&ots=ywgN2W3dyC&sig=1Xq8EaJAkLA3eobqEjCxouyzVrk

Sidiq, M., & Abdul, N. 2020. Karakteristik Tindak Tutur Direktif Tokoh Protagonis dalam Novel Cantik Itu Luka Karya Eka Kurniawan. Lingua Franca: Jurnal Bahasa, Universitas Negeri Padang.

Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. 2013. Kesantunan Bahasa Politisi dalam Talk Show di Metro TV. Disertasi, Universitas Udaya, Denpasar.

Tarigan, H.G. 1990. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Angkasa, Bandung.

Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Longman, New York.

Wardhaugh, R. 1987. Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Wijana, I. D. P. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Andi Offset, Yogyakarta.

Yule, G. 2006. Pragmatik. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Published
2021-10-19
How to Cite
Putu Nindhya Nirmala, I Nyoman Kardana, & Agus Darma Yoga Pratama. (2021). Speech Acts Variation in Social Media Instagram @punapibali. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 7(2), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.7.2.3199.180-184
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 452 times
PDF downloaded = 352 times