Rethinking the Social Foundations of Environmental Politics: Evidence from Bali, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/politicos.6.1.2026.65-76Keywords:
Environmental Movements; Global South, Middle-Income CountriesAbstract
What constitutes the social foundation of environmental politics in the Global South? Existing scholarship advances two influential accounts. One, derived largely from research in advanced industrial democracies, characterizes environmental concern as a post-materialist phenomenon concentrated among affluent and highly educated middle classes. The other, grounded in case studies from developing contexts, emphasizes precarious movements among economically vulnerable communities. Whether these frameworks adequately capture environmental dynamics in middle-income societies, however, remains an open question. This article examines the case of Bali, Indonesia, a province that has experienced intensifying environmental pressures alongside growing public engagement with ecological issues. Drawing on an original representative survey of 1,893 respondents across nine districts (multistage random sampling; margin of error 2.8 per cent at 95 per cent confidence), the study analyses the distribution of pro-environmental behavior across socio-economic and educational strata. The findings indicate that pro-environmental behavior in Bali is not confined to either affluent, highly educated constituencies or economically marginal groups. Rather, environmentally aligned practices are observable across social strata. While differences in degree remain, the overall pattern suggests a more socially dispersed foundation than either the post-materialist or the environmentalism of the poor framework would predict. The article contributes to comparative debates by inviting a reconsideration of the North–South binary as an organizing framework for the study of environmental politics.
References
Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia. Stanford University Press.
Bungin, B. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik Serta Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Kencana.
Cole, S. (2012). A political ecology of water equity and tourism: A Case Study From Bali. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 1221–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANNALS.2012.01.003
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
De Vaus, D. (2006). Research Design in Social Research. Sage.
Dwivedi, R. (2001). Environmental Movements in the Global South. International Sociology, 16(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580901016001003
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and Equity The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India. Routledge.
Geddes, B. (2003). Big Questions Little Answers: How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answer You Get. In Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics (pp. 89–130). University of Michigan Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Harper & Row.
Groves, R. M. ., Fowler, F. J. ., Couper, Mick., Lepkowski, J. M. ., Singer, Eleanor., & Tourangeau, Roger. (2009). Survey Methodology. Wiley.
Guha, R. (2002). Environmentalist of the Poor. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(3), 204–207.
Hadiz, V. (2010). Localising Power in Post- Authoritarian Indonesia. Stanford University Press.
Hasjanah, K., & Simanjuntak, U. (2025, February 11). Solutions to Bali’s Waste Crisis: Reducing Waste at the Source and Developing Waste Management Infrastructure. IESR. https://iesr.or.id/en/solutions-to-balis-waste-crisis-reducing-waste-at-the-source-and-developing-waste-management-infrastructure/
Herin, F. P. (2025, January 27). Sampah di Bali Bikin Risi Wisatawan, Tangkapan Nelayan Juga Ikut Tercemar. Kompas.
Hill, Hal. (2014). Regional dynamics in a decentralized Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. John Wiley and Sons.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Liere, K. D. V., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1086/268583
McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of the Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464
Nulman, E. (2022). Climate Change Movements in the Global North. In M. Grasso & M. Giugni (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements (pp. 185–198). Routledge.
Olofsson, A., & Öhman, S. (2006). General Beliefs and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, 38(6), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506287388
Peluso, N. L. (1995). Whose Woods Are These? Counter-mapping Forest Territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode, 27(4), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8330.1995.TB00286.X
Peluso, N. L., Afiff, S., & Rachman, N. F. (2008). Claiming the Grounds for Reform: Agrarian and Environmental Movements in Indonesia. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(2–3), 377–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1471-0366.2008.00174.X
Robison, Richard., & Hadiz, V. R. . (2015). Reorganising power in Indonesia?: the politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Reorganising-Power-in-Indonesia-The-Politics-of-Oligarchy-in-an-Age-of-Markets/Hadiz-Hadiz-Robison/p/book/9780415332538
Satheesh, S. (2020). Moving beyond class: A critical review of labor?environmental conflicts from the global south. Sociology Compass, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12797
Satheesh, S. (2021). Environmental Movements in the Global South. In K. Bell (Ed.), Diversity and Inclusion in Environmentalism (pp. 51–62). Routledge.
Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1068/A42282
Snow, D. A., Rochford Jr., E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Association, (Vol. 51 No. 4), 464–481. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Benford/publication/246234920_Frame_Alignment_Process_Micromobilization_and_Movement_Participation/links/56cb6ad808ae5488f0db078b/Frame-Alignment-Process-Micromobilization-and-Movement-Participation.pdf
Tarrow, S. (2022). Power in Movement. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009219839
van de Wetering, J., Leijten, P., Spitzer, J., & Thomaes, S. (2022). Does environmental education benefit environmental outcomes in children and adolescents? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101782
Warburton, E. (2017). Resource Nationalism in Indonesia: Ownership Structures and Sectoral Variation in Mining and Palm Oil. Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(3), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2017.13
Wardana, A. (2014). Alliances and Contestations in the Legal Production of Space: The Case of Bali. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 9, 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2194607800000958
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kadek Dwita Apriani, Gde Dwitya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
