Stuck in the Smoke: When Carbon Meets Capital in the Global South
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/politicos.5.2.2025.128-151Keywords:
Carbon Tax, Industrial Resistance, Global South, State-Corporate Alliances, Strategic DelayAbstract
Over the past decade, carbon taxation has emerged as a central instrument in global emission reduction efforts. Yet in many developing countries of the Global South, its implementation has fallen short of the urgency posed by the climate crisis. A significant gap in the literature remains: how industrial resistance and domestic power configurations shape the design and enactment of carbon tax policies. This study examines the dynamics of industrial resistance to carbon taxation in four Global South countries—India, South Africa, Mexico, and South Korea—by highlighting the strategic alliances forged between the state and carbon-intensive industries. This study adopts a qualitative approach, employing a comparative research design to analyze policy documents, statistical data from the World Bank, IEA, and Carbon Pricing Dashboard, along with relevant academic literature. Findings indicate that in all four cases, the state tends not to act as a transformative agent, but rather as a facilitator of fiscal and political compromises with industrial actors. The resulting policies are largely symbolic—characterized by low tax rates, broad exemptions, and the absence of escalation strategies. Framed through the lens of strategic state–capital alliances, this study argues that state–market relations in the Global South cannot be understood purely in technocratic terms, but must be seen as configurations of power that shape the trajectory of energy transitions. These findings offer important theoretical implications for climate policy research and the political economy of development.
References
Agarwal, S. (2016, April 1). Will doubling India’s coal tax boost the clean energy sector? Www.Climatechangenews.Com.
Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2012). The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and experience. The Journal of Environment & Development, 21(2), 152–180.
Alton, T., Arndt, C., Davies, R., Hartley, F., Makrelov, K., Thurlow, J., & Ubogu, D. (2014). Introducing carbon taxes in South Africa. Applied Energy, 116, 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.034
Arlinghaus, J., Calder, J., Danielson, L., Ellis, J., Paciorek, A., & Perry, E. (2018). Better protecting Mexico’s environment. 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292062-11-EN
Arlinghaus, J., & Dender, K. (2017). The environmental tax and subsidy reform in Mexico. https://doi.org/10.1787/A9204F40-EN
Baker, L. (2022a). The political economy of South Africa’s carbon tax. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations.
Baker, L. (2022b). The Political Economy of South Africa’s Carbon Tax. https://doi.org/10.19088/ictd.2022.017
Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2019). Climate politics, metaphors and the fractal carbon trap. Nature Climate Change, 9(12), 919–925.
Bhat, A. A., & Mishra, P. P. (2020). Evaluating the performance of carbon tax on green technology: evidence from India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(2), 2226–2237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06666-x
Choi, I. (2016). A Review of Critical Issues with respect to Carbon Tax. 1, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.21742/AJMSM.2016.1.1.08
Climate Action Tracker. (2022, December 12). Mexico: Policies & Action. Www.Climateactiontracker.Org. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/mexico/policies-action
Climate Transparency. (2020). Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 Climate Action and Responses toThe Covid-19 Crisis. Climate Transparency. https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/South-Africa-CT-2020-Web.pdf
Climate Transparency. (2022). Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 Climate Action. https://www.iniciativaclimatica.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CT2022-Mexico-Web.pdf
Cullenward, D., & Victor, D. G. (2020). Making climate policy work. John Wiley & Sons.
Curran, P. (2018). As South Africa’s carbon tax is delayed again what is the story so far? Www.Lse.Ac.Uk. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/news/as-south-africas-carbon-tax-is-delayed-again-what-is-the-story-so-far/
Díaz, A. O., & Gutierrez, E. (2018). Competing actors in the climate change arena in Mexico: A network analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 215, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.056
Dibley, A., & Garcia-Miron, R. (2020). Can money buy you (climate) happiness? Economic co-benefits and the implementation of effective carbon pricing policies in Mexico. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101659. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101659
Döbbeling-Hildebrandt, N., Miersch, K., Khanna, T. M., Bachelet, M., Bruns, S. B., Callaghan, M., Edenhofer, O., Flachsland, C., Forster, P. M., & Kalkuhl, M. (2024). Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing. Nature Communications, 15(1), 4147.
Dubash, N. K. (2018). Mapping power: The political economy of electricity in India’s states. Oxford University Press.
Dubash, N. K. (2019). India in a warming world: Integrating climate change and development. Oxford University Press.
Dubash, N. K., & Ghosh, S. (2019). National climate policies and institutions. India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development, 329–348.
Dwivedi, S. (2019, December 17). Clean Energy Fund to Compensate for Budgetary Shortfall. Www.Cenfa.Org.
Eberhard, A. (2021, October 3). South Africa’s troubled power utility is being reset: Eskom CEO André de Ruyter explains how. Daily Maverick. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-10-03-south-africas-troubled-power-utility-is-being-reset-eskom-ceo-andre-de-ruyter-explains-how/
Fahad, M. (2021). Carbon Tax On Fuels: India’s New Initiative. 12, 1229–1233. https://doi.org/10.17762/TURCOMAT.V12I7.2772
Garg, E. (2024). Decoding Carbon Tax in India: Climate Policy Dilemma. International Journal of Advanced Legal Research, 4(3), 1–7.
González, A. G. (2021). The International Influence of the Emissions Trading System in Mexico. Springer Climate. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82759-5_5
Gupta, E., & Sudarshan, A. (2009). Energy and poverty in India. In India’s Energy Security (pp. 45–64). Routledge.
Hoffman, M. (2020). Religion, Sectarianism, and Democracy: Theory and Evidence from Lebanon. Political Behavior, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09538-9
ICAP. (2022). Korea Emissions Trading System (K-ETS) General Information. icapcarbonaction.com
Influence Map. (2025, May 29). New Briefing: South Korea’s Emissions Trading Scheme Weakened by Pressure from Major Industries. Influencemap.Org. https://influencemap.org/pressrelease/K-ets-2025-32674
Iyke, B. (2023). Climate change, energy security risk, and clean energy investment. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107225
Jakob, M., & Steckel, J. C. (2014). How climate change mitigation could harm development in poor countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(2), 161–168.
Jayaswal, R. (2022, December 19). Govt may extend coal cess for green mission. Www.Hindustantimes.Com.
Joo, J., Paavola, J., & Van Alstine, J. (2023a). Contested net-zero target setting in a transitioning country: The case of South Korea. Futures, 147, 103114.
Joo, J., Paavola, J., & Van Alstine, J. (2023b). The divergence of South Korea’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) from the EU ETS: An institutional complementarity view. Politics & Policy, 51(6), 1155–1173.
Joseph, K., & Kumary, L. (2023). India’s GST Paradigm and the Trajectory of Fiscal Federalism: An Analysis with Special Reference to Kerala. The Indian Economic Journal, 71, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221146640
Just Share. (2025). The Obstruction Playbook: How corporate lobbying threatens South Africa’s Just Transition. Just Share. https://justshare.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/JS-Lobbying-Report-Obstruction-Playbook-digital-1.pdf
Kalinowski, T. (2020). The politics of climate change in a neo-developmental state: The case of South Korea. International Political Science Review, 42, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120924741
Kalita, U., & Barua, N. A. (2019). Determining a carbon tax rate for India in the context of global climate change. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 8185–8191.
Kanojia, C., & Gautam, S. (2023). GST Compensation Cess in Light of the Recent Financial Developments 2023. VISION: Journal of Indian Taxation. https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.vision.v10i1.1012306
Kim, E.-S. (2016). The politics of climate change policy design in Korea. Environmental Politics, 25, 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1104804
Kim, S. E., Kim, S. Y., & Suh, J. (2024). Public support for carbon tax in South Korea: The role of tax design and revenue recycling. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 11(2), e385.
Labandeira, X., Labeaga, J., López-Otero, X., & Sterner, T. (2022). Distributional impacts of carbon taxation in Mexico. Cuadernos Económicos de ICE. https://doi.org/10.32796/cice.2022.104.7492
Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, e17.
Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. (2018a). The power of process: State capacity and climate policy. Governance, 31(4), 741–757.
Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. (2018b). When do states disrupt industries? Electric cars and the politics of innovation. Review of International Political Economy, 25(4), 505–529.
Meckling, J., & Nahm, J. (2022). Strategic state capacity: how states counter opposition to climate policy. Comparative Political Studies, 55(3), 493–523.
Morning Star. (2014, September 2). Seoul caves in to car firms’ opposition to exhaust tax. Morningstaronline.Co.Uk. https://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-78da-seoul-caves-in-to-car-firms-opposition-to-exhaust-tax-1
Muñoz-Piña, C., De Oca Leon, M. M., & Rivera-Planter, M. (2022). From Negative to Positive Carbon Pricing in Mexico. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy. https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.11.2.cmun
National Treasury. (2013). Carbon Tax Policy Paper: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and facilitating the transition to a green economy. Government of South Africa.
Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate capitalism: global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge University Press.
Nong, D. (2020). Development of the electricity-environmental policy CGE model (GTAP-E-PowerS): A case of the carbon tax in South Africa. Energy Policy, 140, 111375.
Ntombela, S., Bohlmann, H., & Kalaba, M. (2019). Greening the South Africa’s Economy Could Benefit the Food Sector: Evidence from a Carbon Tax Policy Assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10640-019-00352-9
OECD. (2024). Pricing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Key Fing for Korea. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/topics/policy-sub-issues/carbon-pricing-and-energy-taxes/carbon-pricing-korea.pdf
Oh, H., Hyon, J., & Kim, J.-O. (2017). Korea’s approach to overcoming difficulties in adopting the emission trading scheme. Climate Policy, 17, 947–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1213696
Oh, I. Y., & Yoon, Y. C. (2018). A Study of Policy Change on K-ETS and Its Objective Conformity. J of Clim Chan Rese, 9, 325–342.
Ojha, V. P., Pohit, S., & Ghosh, J. (2020). Recycling carbon tax for inclusive green growth: A CGE analysis of India. Energy Policy, 144, 111708.
Porras, P. D. N. (2024). Mexico is Waiting for the Results of a Pilot ETS. Www.Climatescorecard.Org. https://www.climatescorecard.org/2024/06/mexico-is-waiting-for-the-results-of-a-pilot-ets
Pradhan, B., & Ghosh, J. (2012). The Impact of Carbon Taxes on Growth Emissions and Welfare in India: A CGE analysis. https://consensus.app/papers/the-impact-of-carbon-taxes-on-growth-emissions-and-welfare-pradhan-ghosh/15252d7490f35f418497def1ec128d39/
Pradhan, B. K., & Ghosh, J. (2022). A computable general equilibrium (CGE) assessment of technological progress and carbon pricing in India’s green energy transition via furthering its renewable capacity. Energy Economics, 106, 105788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105788
Qutubuddin, M. K. (2023). How India’s Carbon Tax Implementation Could Set a Precedent for G20 Countries. Earth.Org. https://earth.org/india-carbon-tax/
Rabe, B. G. (2018). Can we price carbon? MIT Press.
Rajamani, L. (2016). Ambition and differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: Interpretative possibilities and underlying politics. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(2), 493–514.
Rattani, V., & Dubash, N. K. (2016). India’s NDC: The 2030 targets and beyond. Centre for Policy Research, Policy Brief.
Renner, S., Lay, J., & Greve, H. (2017). Household Welfare and CO2 Emission Impacts of Energy and Carbon Taxes in Mexico. Energy Policy & Economics EJournal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2977240
Renner, S., Lay, J., & Greve, H. (2018). Household welfare and CO2 emission impacts of energy and carbon taxes in Mexico. Energy Economics, 72, 222–235.
Routers. (2014, September 2). South Korea delays smog tax; starts emission trading in 2015 - finance minister. Routers. https://www.reuters.com/article/southkorea-carbon-idUSL3N0R31S620140902/
Sarpong, K. A., Xu, W., Gyamfi, B. A., & Ofori, E. K. (2023). A step towards carbon neutrality in E7: The role of environmental taxes, structural change, and green energy. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, 117556.
Sathaye, J., Iyer, M., McNeil, M., & Kramer, K. J. (2011). Strategies for Low Carbon Growth In India: Industry and Non Residential Sectors.
Shinhye Kang. (2011, January 11). South Korea carbon trading bill faces opposition from business groups. Eco-Business.Com. https://www.eco-business.com/news/south-korea-carbon-trading-bill-faces-opposition-b
Siweya, N. (2021). Carbon tax to lower emissions: the likely impact of carbon emissions tax on households in South Africa. 2021, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.47348/amtj/2021/i1a12
Skovgaard, J., & Ferrari, S. S. (2022). The unlikely Mexican carbon tax—a question of economic-environmental synergies? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66, 2623–2639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2081136
Skovgaard, J., & Ferrari, S. S. (2023). The unlikely Mexican carbon tax—a question of economic-environmental synergies? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(13), 2623–2639.
Skovgaard, J., & van Asselt, H. (2019). The politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform: Implications for climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(4), e581.
Steenkamp, L.-A. (2017). To incentivise or penalise: an analysis of the proposed carbon tax in South Africa. 47–63. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111171.00014
Suk, S. (2017). Korean Companies’ Understanding of Carbon Pricing and Its Influence on Policy Acceptance and Practices. Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 26(4), 577–612.
Van Heerden, J., Blignaut, J., Bohlmann, H., Cartwright, A., Diederichs, N., & Mander, M. (2016). The economic and environmental effects of a carbon tax in South Africa: A dynamic CGE modelling approach. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 19(5), 714–732.
Verma, R., & sivamani, G. (2022). Modelling-the-Impact-of-the-Clean-Environment-Cess. Working Paper - Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
Villanueva, D., & Ghosh, A. (2024, April 3). Mexico ETS delay likely to persist on regulatory uncertainty, lack of political will: sources. Www.Spglobal.Com. https://www.spglobal.com/commodity-insights/en/news-research/latest-news/energy-transition/040324-mexico-ets-delay-likely-to-persist-on-regulatory-uncertainty-lack-of-political-will-sources
Wang, B., & Gopal, M. (2023, September 7). ASPI Climate Action Brief: South Korea. Asia Society Policy Institute. https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/aspi-climate-action-brief-south-korea
Winchester, N., & Reilly, J. (2019). The Economic, Energy, and Emissions Impacts of Climate Policy in South Korea. Climate Change Economics. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007819500106
Zahoor, Z., Khan, I., & Hou, F. (2021). Clean energy investment and financial development as determinants of environment and sustainable economic growth: evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 16006–16016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16832-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luthfi Hasanal Bolqiah, Fullah Jumaynah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







