NOTARIAL DEEDS RELATED TO DEFAULTS, FRAUD AND EMBEZZLEMENT
Abstract
The aim of this study is to find out the crime of fraud (Article 378 of the Criminal Code) and the criminal act of embezzlement (Article 372 of the Criminal Code) can be charged to one of the parties in the agreement made by the notarial deed is considered to have committed default. This study uses normative juridical methods, which means that this study focuses on favourable laws such as Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, the Civil Code, the Criminal Code, and other laws and regulations. Based on analysis, the results of this study revealed that if one of the parties in the agreement made by his notarial deed is considered to have committed a default, it cannot be charged with the crime of fraud (Article 378 of the Criminal Code) and the criminal act of embezzlement (Article 372 of the Criminal Code) based on Article 11 of Law No. 12 of 2005 concerning ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Some judges' decisions with loose verdicts (slag van all rechttsvervolging), i.e., the act charged is proven, but the act of default does not constitute a criminal offence.
References
Aji, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No, 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Andryanto, C. (2018). Law Enforcement Against Fraud and/or Embezzlement (Study of KSP Intidana Central Java, Indonesia). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 3(1), 47–74. doi:10.15294/jils.v3i01.23205
Harahap, M. Y. (1986). Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni.
Harahap, M. Y. (2000). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan) (Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Koesoemawati, I., & Rijan, Y. (2009). Ke Notaris. Bogor: Raih Asa Sukses.
Nahak, S. (2020). The Liability of Criminal Law towards a Notary Official in the Crime of Embezzlement at the Denpasar District Court. Jurnal Notariil, 5(2), 107–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.5.2.2572.107-117
Sjaifurrachman, & Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Soesilo, R. (1989). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politea.
Subekti, R. (1979). Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Intermasa.
Waluyo, D. R. (2001). Kewenangan Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum (Oktober-De). Jakarta: Media Notariat (Menor).
Copyright (c) 2022 NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract viewed = 47 times
PDF downloaded = 38 times
