LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE PARTIES IN CREDIT AGREEMENT WITH FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE AFTER THE ISSUENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019

  • Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang
Keywords: Legal Protection, Fiduciary Guarantees, Parties, Constitutional Court Decision

Abstract

Fiduciary Guarantee Law is one of the material guarantees specifically regulated in Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Guarantees that realizes the public's need for legal certainty but guaranteed objects still have economic value.  Article 15 of Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees is felt burdensome to debtors, because creditors make forced efforts to take fiduciary guarantee objects in the form of 2-wheeled and 4-wheeled vehicles. The purpose of this study is (1) Finding and analyzing the basis of the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (2) Finding and explaining the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on legal protection for parties to credit agreements with fiduciary guarantees (3) Finding and explaining constraints on Financial Service Institutions (LJK) in the implementation of constitutional court decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019.  The research method used is juridical normative and empirical with a case study approach so that achievements are more comprehensive related to the principle of legal protection for parties in fiduciary guarantees. The result obtained that since the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, the executive confiscation cannot be done directly by creditors must go through a court decision. The executorial confiscation in Article 15 of Law Number 42 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee has been contrary to Article 1 (3), Article 27 (1), Article 28D (1), Article 28G (1) and Article 28H (4) of the Constitution of 1945. It takes good faith from the parties so that the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 guarantees justice, legal certainty and provides legal protection. An agreement is required in accordance with the principle of freedom of proportionate contract, there is a balance of position between the debtor and the creditor.

References

Agus Yudho Hermoko, Principle of Proportionality in commercial contracts, Laksbang Mediatma, Yogyakarta, 2008

Friedman, L. M. Legal Systems from a Social Science Perspective. (M. Khozin, Trans.). Bandung: Nusa Media, 2009.

H. Salim, HS, Development of Guarantee Law in Indonesia, Rajagrafindo, Jakarta. 2004.

JP. Frtzgerald, salmond on Jurisprudence, sweet & Mazwell, Lindon, 1966.

Munir Fuady, Business Law in Theory and Practice Ed. 1, Image of Aditya Bakti 1996.

Moch. Isnaeni, Introduction to Property Security Law, PT. Revka Petra Media, Surabaya, 2016 p. 159

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Introduction to Legal Studies, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2006.

Philipus M. Hadjon, Legal Protection for the People in Indonesia, PT. Science Development, Surabaya, 1987.

Philipus M Hadjon, Dogmatic Studies (Normative), Faculty of Law Airlangga University, Surabaya, 1994

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, Legal Research Methodology, PT Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1983

Sudikno Mertokusumo, The Discovery of an Introduction to Law, Liberty, Yogyakarta

Salim H.S, Contract Design and Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) (Ed. 1, Sinar Graphic 2006)

Satjipto Rahardjo, Legal Theory of Orderly Strategy of Space and Public Order and General, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2010.

Thamrin Abdullah, Francis Tantri. Banks and Financing Institutions, Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta. 2002

Regulations

Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees
Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Journal and Paper

Aida Mardatillah. (2020), MK Interprets Default in Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees, Accessed on April 28th 2020. Hukum Online. Website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5e13345852149/mktafsirkan-cidera-janji-dalam-eksekusi-jaminan-fidusia/

Draft National Law Development Planning Document 2015-2019, BPHN, Ministry of Law and Human Rights RI, Bali, September 26th – 28th 2012

Jihadul Amry, Juridical Analysis of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18/PUU/XVII/2019 Concerning the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantees Against Default Debtors in Indonesia, Dinamika, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Volume 26, Nomor 11, August 2020, p1372 – 1374

Jazau Elvi Hasani, et .al. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Agustus 2020 Volume 3, Nomor 2,p. 227.

Lukman Santoso Az dan Yahyanto, (2016), Introduction to Law, Malang: Setara Press. h. 78.

Syafrida, Ralang Hartati, Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu/XVII/2019, Jurnal Hukum Adil, Vol. 11 No.1 tahun 2020, p. 119

Sri Ahyani, ‘Legal Protection for Creditors in Fiduciary Guarantee Agreements, Jurnal Yuridika, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Bandung, Vol 24 No (2011), p.308-309

Suratman, Overview of KSEI and KPEI in the Implementation of the Scripless Stock Trading System on the Stock Exchange, Jurnal Yurispruden: Journal of faculty of Law Universitas Islam Malang, Vol. 1, Nomor 2, January 2018, Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Malang: Malang. p. 98

Website
https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20200115/89/1190599/sita-jaminan-fidusia-ylki-penyelesaian-idealnya-di-tingkat-produsen diunduh pada 5 Maret 2020.

https://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/17484/node/30/uu-no-42-tahun-1999-jaminan-fidusia diunduh pada 5 Maret 2020
Published
2021-12-07
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 67 times
PDF downloaded = 64 times