The Notary's Responsibility for False Statements From the Parties in the Making of Authentic Deeds Reviewed From the UUPA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.10.2.2025.98-104Keywords:
Notary's responsibility, false statement, authentic deedAbstract
A Notary is a Public Official who is authorized to make authentic deeds in accordance with the provisions of UUJN Article 1 number 1. Notaries are required to be responsible for the deeds they have made. However, the problem is when the authentic deed made by the Notary contains false information or untruths from the parties. In this case, the Notary only contains data and information provided by the parties. There are no regulations regarding the notary's obligation to validate information from the parties. The purpose of this study is to determine the notary's responsibility when the authentic deed contains false information from the parties and the form of legal protection for notaries against deeds containing false information. The research method used is the normative juridical legal research method which departs from the absence of norms where there is no regulation regarding false information contained in the Notary's deed. Using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials as well as conceptual approaches and statutory approaches. The results of the study can be concluded that the notary is responsible for the deeds he made both civilly, criminally and administratively. Criminal responsibility lies entirely with the party who provides false information. If a notary intentionally falsifies or manipulates the contents of a deed, he or she can be held legally responsible. Legal protection for notaries can be seen in article 66 of the UUJN where a notary for the benefit of the court, investigation, public prosecutor, or judge with the approval of the Notary Honorary Council.
References
Adjie, H. (2014). Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir tematik terhadap UU No. 30 tahun 2004 tentang jabatan notaris.
Anshori, A. G. (2009). Lembaga kenotariatan Indonesia: perspektif hukum dan etika.
Aptaningsih, N. M. I., Senastri, N. M. J., & Jaya Utama, I. W. K. (2025). The Authority of Notaries in the Preparation of Deeds Concerning Credit Guarantees as a Form of Resolution for Non-Performing Loans. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(6), 4271–4281. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2131
Batubara, Z. M. (2011). Analisis yuridis terhadap pembatalan akta notaris (Studi kasus pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Chazawi, A. (2002). Kejahatan Terhadap Pemalsuan. Rajawali Pers.
Habib Adjie. (2009). Meneropong Khazanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia (Kumpulan Tulisan Tentang Notaris dan PPAT). Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hamdi, A. N., & Putra, M. F. M. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Atas Keterangan Palsu Dalam Akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa. UNES Law Review, 7(1), 381–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v7i1.2317
Handayani, N. A., & Priyono, E. A. (2023). Tanggungjawab Notaris Terkait Adanya Keterangan Palsu Di Dalam Akta Yang Dibuatnya. Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani, 13(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v13i1.6495
Marzuki, P. M. (2015). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi), PT. Adhitya Andrebina Agung, Jakarta.
Nico. (2003). Tanggung jawab Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum. Center of Documentation and Studies of Bussines Law, Yogyakarta.
Sakina, N., & Santoso, B. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik yang Mengandung Keterangan Palsu. Notarius, 17(3), 2415–2429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i3.47166
Satjipto, R. (2006). Ilmu Hukum, Cet V. Keenam, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Siahaan, K. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Recital Review, 1(2), 72–88.
Sinaga, A. K., Siregar, M., Mulyadi, M., & Tony, T. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris terhadap Keterangan Palsu dalam Akta Autentik (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 379 K/Pid/2021). Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), 4675–4689.
Sjaifurrachman, & Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 252–253.
Supriadi. (2006). Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Tjukup, I. K., Siki Layang, I. W. B., Martana, N. A., Markeling, I. K., Dananjaya, N. S., Arsha Putra, I. P. R., Purnawan, K. W., Sari, M. D. S. M., Pundari, K. N., & Tribuana, P. A. R. (2016). Akta Notaris (Akta Otentik) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Peristiwa Hukum Perdata. Acta Comitas. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2016.v01.i02.p05
Wiradiredja, H. S. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Didasarkan Pada Keterangan Palsu Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Dan KUHP. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 32(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v32i1.90
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ni Nyoman Ayu Sri Ratna Sari, I Made Walesa Putra, I Gusti Ngurah Dharma Laksana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





