POSITION OF GRANT DEEDS IN THE CASE OF SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 175/K/PDT/2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.10.1.2025.45-55Keywords:
Position of Grant Deed, PPAT, Supreme Court Decision Number 175/K/PDT/2021, PapuaAbstract
A grant of land rights is a gift from one person to another person without any compensation and is done voluntarily, without any contravention from the recipient of the gift and the gift takes place while the grantor is still alive. The act of granting land rights must be done before the PPAT with a Grant Deed is made which is the basis for registering land rights at the Regency/City Land Office. The problems that will be discussed in this research are first, what is the position of the grant deed in relation to the Supreme Court Decision Number 175/K/PDT/2021 in Papua, Second, what are the challenges in the Supreme Court Decision Number 175/K/PDT/2021. The aim of the research is to examine and analyze the position of grant deeds in the case of Supreme Court Decision Number 175/K/PDT/2021 in Papua and to study and analyze the challenges in Supreme Court Decision Number 175/K/PDT/2021 in Papua. This legal research is normative juridical research, namely normative juridical research referring to legal norms contained in laws and regulations and court decisions as well as legal norms that exist in society. The results of the research, the Land Deed Making Officer must put the grant agreement in the form of a PPAT deed, namely a grant deed as explained that every grant of land must be made with a PPAT deed as mentioned in Article 37 and Article 39 Paragraph 1 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, making In the grant deed, it was seen that in the process of making the grant deed there were things that did not comply with the applicable regulations. Ms. Analyst Demotekay, who is the grant giver, said that she had never given the grant to Susilawati and there was no agreement between Ms. Analyst Demotekay and Martius Semuel Darinya, so this means that it can be suspected that there was engineering in this legal action on the part of the recipient of the grant. A series of legal cases involving fake grants, Mrs. Analis Demotekay and Martius Semuel, found that there was negligence and inaccuracy of PPAT Puspo Adi Cahayo S.H., M.Kn in making the Deed of Grant which resulted in the transfer of land rights to Susilawati's property.
References
Arnawa, I. M., Kosasih, J. I., & Utama, I. W. K. J. (2024). Pembatalan Land Lease Agreement yang dialihkan kepada Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 4(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2565
Aulia, A. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-hatian PPAT Dalam Proses Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Sebagai Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum. Recital Review, 4(1), 244–278.
Djumardin, D., HS, H. S., & Sili, E. B. (2023). Kekuatan Mengikat Akta Jual Beli Di Desa Ongko. Private Law, 3(3), 871–877.
Lestari, R. (2013). Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa secara Mediasi di Pengadilan dan di luar pengadilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Riau, 3(2), 9080.
Meliala, D. S. (2014). Hukum Perdata Dalam Perspektif BW. Nuansa Aulia.
Muchsin, T., Saliro, S. S., Manullang, S. O., & Miharja, M. (2020). Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Hal Pendaftaran Tanah: Sebuah Tinjauan Kewenangan Dan Akibat Hukum. Madani Legal Review, 4(1), 63–80.
Parlindungan, A. P. (1999). Pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia:(berdasarkan PP 24 Tahun 1997) dilengkapi dengan Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PP 37 Tahun 1998). Mandar Maju.
Prawira, I., & Yoga, G. B. (2016). Tanggung Jawab PPAT Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Ius, 4(1), 69–77.
Prayogo, R. T. (2016). Penerapan asas kepastian hukum dalam peraturan mahkamah agung nomor 1 tahun 2011 tentang hak uji materiil dan dalam peraturan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 06/PMK/2005 tentang pedoman beracara dalam pengujian undang-undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(2), 191–201.
Suriawan, K., & Mariadi, N. N. (2015). Proses Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Bentuk Akta Hibah.
Suryadini, Y., & Widiyanti, A. T. (2020). Akibat hukum hibah wasiat yang melebihi legitime portie. Media Iuris, 3(2), 241–256.
Ter Haar, B. (1983). Asas-asas dan susunan hukum adat. Pradnya Paramita.
Utomo, H. I. W., & SH, M. K. (2020). Memahami Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Prenada Media.
Winarta, F. H. (2022). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional: Edisi Kedua. Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M. Remon Septariawan, Yuliandri Yuliandri, Delfiyanti Delfiyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
