Pidana Mati Terhadap Kejahatan Narkotika Ditinjau Dari Pasal 28I Ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945

  • Roby Anugrah Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau
  • Raja Desril Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau
  • Hari Sutra Disemadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau
Keywords: Right to life, narcotics crimes, death penalty

Abstract

The debate about capital punishment from classical to modern times is still a debate that has not found a dialogue point. From the Beccaria era which stated that capital punishment was not effective in tackling crime, many killings occurred and will continue to occur until today the pros and cons of capital punishment still maintain their respective arguments. In answering the problems regarding the pros and cons of capital punishment against narcotics crime, this study uses a qualitative analysis method with a type of normative legal research. The data used in normative legal research is, of course, secondary data obtained through library research. In Indonesia, the debate about capital punishment against narcotics criminals reappears to the public when the provisions of the threat of capital punishment in the Narcotics Law are submitted to a judicial review or judicial review to the Constitutional Court which is considered to conflict with the most basic human rights namely the right to life guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. Whereas if the death penalty is investigated for narcotics crimes and other crimes in general as long as it is firmly regulated in statutory regulations it does not contradict the right to life that humans have from birth.

 

References

Anugrah, R. (2019). Pemaafan Korban Ditinjau Dari Tujuan Pemidanaan Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 20–35. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi.org/10.30652/jih.v8i1.5939

Arief, A. (2019). Problematika Penjatuhan Hukuman Pidana Mati dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Pidana. Kosmik Hukum, 19(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v19i1.4086

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Batubara, R. F. (2014). KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI PIDANA MATI TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA. LAW REFORM, 10(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v10i1.12458

Busnarma, T. (2019). PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA DENDA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN DAN PEREDARAN GELAP NARKOTIKA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PADANG. Soumatera Law Review, 2(1), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v2i1.3559

Darmadi, N. S. (2015). Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2(2), 258–269.

Eleanora, F. N. (2012). Eksistensi Pidana Mati Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya, 29(318), 10–14.

Gukguk, R. G. R., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2019). TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA SEBAGAI TRANSNASIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.337-351

Heriyono. (2020). PELAKSANAAN HUKUMAN MATI DALAM PERSEPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies, 1(1), 76–89.

Istighfar, W. A., Jaya, N. S. P., & Pujiyono. (2017). EFEKTIVITAS PIDANA MATI BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM PRAKTEK PEMIDANAAN DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI SUDUT HAK ASASI MANUSIA. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(2), 1–18.

Jainah, Z. O., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2019). Death Penalty For Drugs Dealers and Traffickers From The Perspective of Islamic Law. AL-’ADALAH, 15(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v15i1.2657

Lasmadi, S., Sari, R. K., & Disemadi, H. S. (2020). Restorative Justice Approach as an Alternative Companion of the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020) (pp. 206–209). Paris, France: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.044

Lubis, T. M. (2009). Kontroversi Hukuman Mati Perbedaan Pendapat Hakim Konstitusi. Jakarta: Kompas.

Reksodiputro, M. (2012). SINDIKAT NARKOBA DI INDONESIA DAN ANTISIPASINYA. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v2i1.102

Rofiq, A., Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2019). Criminal Objectives Integrality in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Al-Risalah, 19(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v19i2.458

Sahetapy, J. E. (1982). Suatu Studi Khusus Mengenai Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sitanggang, D., & Fakhriah, E. L. (2019). Disparity of the Waiting Period of the Capital Punishment Execution for Narcotics and Murder Cases in the Perspective of Human Rights. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 19(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2019.19.1.1266

Sudarto. (2009). Hukum pidana I. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto.

Syahrizal, A. (2006). Peradilan Konstitusi, Suatu Studi tentang Adjudikasi Konstitusional Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Normatif. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Published
2020-07-23
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 55 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 25 times