Perbandingan Konsep Orisinalitas Karya Cipta Ilustrasi Hasil AI Antara Indonesia dan Swedia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.19.2.2025.129-141Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, Originality, Ownership, Legal Comparison, Indonesia, SwedenAbstract
Illustrations generated by artificial intelligence (AI), commonly referred to as Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC), have raised significant challenges in copyright law, particularly concerning originality, ownership, and enforcement. This study aims to analyze and compare the legal approaches of Indonesia and Sweden regarding the protection and enforcement of copyright for AI-generated illustrations. Employing a normative juridical-comparative method, the findings reveal that AI-generated illustrations do not qualify for copyright protection in either Indonesia or Sweden due to the inability of AI to satisfy the originality principle, which requires human creativity, and its incapacity to be recognized as a legal subject. In Indonesia, the Copyright Law (Law No. 28 of 2014) does not explicitly regulate works produced by AI. In contrast, Sweden has made significant progress by harmonizing its domestic regulations with the European Union’s AI Act, set to be fully implemented by 2026. As part of enforcement efforts, the national research body “AI Sweden” plays a pivotal role in exploring mechanisms for enforcing copyright over AI-generated illustrations. This study recommends revising Indonesia's Copyright Law to ensure relevant legal protection and develop effective enforcement mechanisms for AI-generated illustrations, aligning with technological advancements and the needs of the creative industries.
References
Adolfsson, S. (2021). AI as a Creator: How do AI-generated creations challenge EU intellectual property law and how should the EU react? [Uppsala Universitet]. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1589220/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Agung Damarsasongko. (t.t.). Orisinalitas dalam Sebuah Karya. https://operadjki.dgip.go.id/uploads/files/lessons73/966963c4b6b40d6789bd06a9d599c7cc.pdf
AI Act, AI-förordningen. (2024, Mei 21). [Text]. https://skr.se/skr/naringslivarbetedigitalisering/digitalisering/euforordningareudirektivdigitalisering/beslutat/aiactaiforordningen.70265.html
AI Sweden. (t.t.). About AI Sweden. Diambil 29 Oktober 2024, dari https://www.ai.se/en/about
Andrews, S. S. (2023). Copyright Originality in the Digital Space. Dalam I. Gupta (Ed.), Handbook on Originality in Copyright: Cases and Materials (hlm. 1–24). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1144-6_9-1
Aulia, C., Nugraha, E., & Parlindungan, R. B. (2023). The Copyright Responsibilities of Artificial Intelligence in the Digital Age. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i2.26042
Balasubramaniam, G. S., Benson, S. R., Chan, A. S., Jacobs, K., Jenkins, K. V., Smirity Kaushik, Jiaqi Ma, Sanfilippo, M. R., Eryclis Rodrigues Bezerra Silva, Tither, E., Twidale, M., Underwood, T. E., Yu, Y., & Kyrie Zhou. (2023). Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (AI). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35623.32165
Chatterjee, M. (2022). The Fruits of Authorship: A Theory of Copyright (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4901491). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4901491
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual. (2023, Februari 20). Orisinalitas Kunci Karya Mendapat Pelindungan Hak Cipta. AGENDA KI. https://www.dgip.go.id/index.php/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/orisinalitas-kunci-karya-mendapat-pelindungan-hak-cipta
Doomen, J. (2023). The artificial intelligence entity as a legal person. Information & Communications Technology Law, 32(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2023.2196827
Eviani, N. Y., Maskun, & Faqi, A. F. (2024). Legal Challenges of AI-Induced Copyright Infringement: Evaluating Liability and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Digital Era. Jambura Law Review, 6(2), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24459
Fatmawati, R., & Mangar, I. (2024). Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Legal Subject on Intellectual Property Rights. Journal of Development Research, 8(1), 1–6.
Future of Life Institute. (2024, Agustus 22). The AI Act: Responsibilities of the EU Member States | EU Artificial Intelligence Act. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/responsibilities-of-member-states/
Gaffar, H., & Albarashdi, S. (2024). Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Works: Exploring Originality and Ownership in a Digital Landscape. Asian Journal of International Law, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251323000735
Guo, D., Chen, H., Wu, R., & Wang, Y. (2023). AIGC challenges and opportunities related to public safety: A case study of ChatGPT. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 4(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001
Hanfelt, A. (2024). AI and Copyright law. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9158407/file/9158414.pdf
Hans, M., & Limantara, C. P. (2023, Maret 24). Menyoal Aspek Hak Cipta atas Karya Hasil Artificial Intelligence. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/menyoal-aspek-hak-cipta-atas-karya-hasil-artificial-intelligence-lt641d06ea600d9
Henrik Bengtsson. (2012). EU harmonisation of the copyright originality criterion. Delphi. https://www.delphi.se/uploads/2018/09/120618euharmonisationbengtsson-1.pdf
John McCarthy. (2007). What is artificial intelligence? Stanford University.
Kirakosyan, A. (2024). Intellectual Property Ownership of AI-Generated Content. Digital Law Journal, 4(3), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2023-4-3-3
Makarowski, F. (2018). AI and creative machines: Copyright protection for AI generated works under EU and Swedish law. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1287396
Mauritz Kop. (t.t.). AI & Intellectual Property: Towards an Articulated Public Domain. Stanford University. https://www.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Mauritz-Kop_AI-Intellectual-Property_Towards-an-Articulated-Public-Domain.pdf
OECD. (2020). The Digitalisation of Science, Technology and Innovation: Key Developments and Policies. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b9e4a2c0-en
Pratiwi Eka Sari. (2021). Kebutuhan Perluasan Doktrin Orisinalitas dan Fiksasi Dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Sebagai Perlindungan Kreativitas Anak Bangsa. DHARMASISYA, 1(1), 444–458.
PRV. (t.t.). Copyright on AI images. Diambil 29 Oktober 2024, dari https://www.prv.se/en/copyright/for-users/copyright-on-ai-images/
Wang, X., Hong, Y., & He, X. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) applications in the metaverse: Challenges, solutions, and future directions. IET Blockchain, 4(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1049/blc2.12076
Widodo, W., & Bakir, H. (2024). Legal Certainty of Limitations on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Voice Cloning in Songs and Music as A Form of Protection of Musicians’ Copyrights. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2024, 25 May 2024, Jakarta, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2024, 25 May 2024, Jakarta, Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349353
WIPO. (2024). Sweden Ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2024. GII Innovation Ecosystems & Data Explorer. https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en
Zahrasafa P Mahardika & Angga Priancha. (2021). Pengaturan Hukum Artifical Intelligence Indonesia Saat Ini. hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pengaturan-hukum-artifical-intelligence-indonesia-saat-ini-lt608b740fb22b7/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Naeli Rizqi Marhamah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
