ANALISIS KAPABILITAS DINAMIS DALAM REHABILITASI DAN REKONSTRUKSI PASCA BENCANA DI KOTA PALU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/jcpa.5.1.2025.36-43Keywords:
Disaster, Dynamic Capabilities, Rehabilitation and ReconstructionAbstract
The natural disaster that struck Palu City in 2018 had a significant impact on both the lives of its residents and the city’s infrastructure. In response, various rehabilitation and reconstruction programs have been implemented by the government in collaboration with humanitarian organizations. However, the effectiveness of these recovery policies continues to face numerous challenges. This study aims to analyze the extent to which dynamic capabilities comprising sensing, seizing, and transforming have been applied in the management of rehabilitation and reconstruction efforts in Palu City. A qualitative case study approach is employed to explore in depth the practices, obstacles, and potential of post-disaster recovery policies. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis, with thematic analysis serving as the primary method of data processing. The findings indicate that in the sensing phase, the identification of community needs remains suboptimal due to weak inter-agency coordination and the lack of real-time data. In the seizing phase, the allocation of resources and strategic partnerships has not functioned effectively, hindered by bureaucratic barriers and overlapping programs among stakeholders. Meanwhile, in the transforming phase, the development of adaptive and sustainable systems still faces structural challenges such as land disputes and low community participation. The study concludes that the implementation of dynamic capabilities in Palu City requires further strengthening to ensure a more responsive, efficient, and sustainable recovery process in the face of future disasters.
References
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB). (2019). Kajian Risiko Bencana Nasional Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah 2022-2026. Eprints UMS+2inarisk.bnpb.go.id+2Bappeda Kota Palu+2
Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. In Journal of Management (Vol. 36, Issue 1, pp. 256–280). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.
Bryman, Alan. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Constance, H., Sydney, F., Will, M., Margaret Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David Teece, & Sidney Winter. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES: WHAT ARE THEY? In Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J (Vol. 21).
Miles, M., A, M. H., & Johnny, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed) (3rd ed., Vol. 3).
Patton. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Vol. 4). Sage Publications.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action. In Journal of Management Studies (Vol. 49, Issue 8, pp. 1395–1401). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01080.x
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780










