Competitive Dynamic between Individual Behaviors of the Mass Media Industry
Competitive behavior is also a major factor in the competitive media industry is now getting very tight. This is caused by the print media competition with online or Internet-based media in getting news and advertising to attract participants from readers. This research method uses historical depth case study intended to produce an institutional explanation of the characteristics of the typical behavior shown by principal component analysis. The study also incorporates the classical approach to the historical focus on qualitative interpretation of data, In order to survive, the print media should be able to maintain the credibility and public trust on the information presented is now more attractive and more accurate. The print media began to be threatened because of the rapid development of emerging online media via internet access has encouraged people to seek to access online media simply and easily via mobile phones or gadgets. Connoisseurs of the print media loyal readers will turn to online news media. Reality has happened would threaten the print media industry, but the print media already have the characteristics of the first, namely: the news that is always clear, complete and detailed, online media faster and more sophisticated to broadcast news and always up to date but the online news can only be enjoyed by using the sophisticated tool not all communities have the tools and not all people can use sophisticated technology to always follow the news online.
Bryant, J. M. (1994). Evidence and Explanation in History and Sociology : Critical Reflections on Goldthorpe ’ s Critique of Historical Sociology. The British Journal OfSociology, 45(1), 3–19. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/591521.pdf?seq=1
Carden, A., & Allen, D. W. (2013). The institutional revolution : measurement & the economic emergence of the modern. The University of Chicago Press, 14, 267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-0029-7
Carr, E. H. (1966). What is history? Foundations of a Planned Economy, 1, 157–185.
Chen, G., & Hambrik, D. C (2012). CEO Replacement in Turnaround Situations : Executive ( Mis ) Fit and Its Performance Implications CEO Replacement in Turnaround Situations : Executive ( Mis ) Fit and Its Performance Implications. Organization Science Publication, 23(1), 225–243. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0629
Chen, M. J., & Hambrik, D. C. (1995). Speed , Stealth , And Selective Attack : How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms In Competitive Behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453–482. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/256688?seq=1
Chen, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive Dynamics. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.660762
Chen, M. J., Su, K, H., & Tsai, W. (2007). Competitive Tension : The Awareness-Motivation-Capability Perspective. Academy Of Management Journal, 50(1), 101–118. Retrieved from http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~khsu/vita/amj.pdf
Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative Networks And Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management, 26(3), 431-445. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/259186?seq=1
Eliram, L. M., Tate, W. L., & Feitzinger, E. G. (2013). Factor-Market Rivalry And Competition For Supply Chain Resources. Journal of Supply Chain Management Resources, 49, 29–46. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12001
Greif, A. (1993). Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade : The Maghribi Traders ’ Coalition. The American Economic Review, 83(3), 525–548. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117532?seq=1
Greif, A., & Laitin, D. D. (2004). A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 633–652. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041395
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J (1996). The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms’ Competitive Moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2393871
Ingram, P., & Silverman, B. (2016). The New Institutionalism in Strategic Management. Advances in Strategic Management. 19, 1-30. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279931264_The_New_Institutionalism_in_Strategic_Management_Advances_in_Strategic_Management_Vol_19
Jacobides, M. G. (2005). Industry Change Through Vertical Disintegration : How And Why Markets Emerged In Mortgage Banking. Academy Of Management Journal, 48(3), 465–498. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8744/a0f0ec40a5243458f2604fe70f5b68c3629c.pdf
Ketchen, D. J., Snow, C. C., & Hoover, V. L. (2004). Research on Competitive Dynamics : Recent Accomplishments and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6), 779–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.002
Lamberg, J. Laurila, J., & Nokelainen, T. (2016). Institutional Path Dependence in Competitive Dynamics : The Case of Paper Industries in Finland and the USA. Managerial And Decision Economics, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2839
Langlois, R. N. (1985). Rationality , institutions , and explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Retrieved from https://richard-langlois.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1617/2019/09/RIE.pdf
Langlois, R. N. (2013). The Institutional Revolution : A review essay, 26, 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-013-0237-5
Livengood, R. S., & Reger, R. K. (2010). That ’ S Our Turf ! Identity Domains And Competitive Dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 48–66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.1.zok48
Mantzavinos, C., North, D. C., & Shariq, S. (2004). Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance. Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance Learning, 2(2), 75–84. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000635
Ndofor, H. A., Sirmon, D. G., & He, X. (2011). Firm Resources , Competitive Actions And Performance : Investigating A Mediated Model With Evidence From The In-Vitro Diagnostics Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared Mental Models : Ideologies and Institutions. KYKLOS: International Review for Social Sciene, 47(1), 3–31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1994.tb02246.x
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2586011?seq=1
Podolny, J. M. (1993). A Status-based Competition Model of Market Competition. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872. Retrieved from https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/status-based-model-market-competition
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1996/11/what-is-strategy
Robertson, P. L., & Langlois, R. N. (1994). Institutions, Inertia and Changing Industrial Leadership. University of Victoria, 8(6), 359–378. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.2.359
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M. J. (1991). Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses and Performance In The US . Domestic Airline Industry. Academy Of Management Journal, 34(1), 60–85. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/256302?seq=1
Smith, J. B., & Barclay, D. W. (1999). Selling partner relationships: The role of interdependence and relative influence. The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 19(4), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1997.0217
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0266%28199708%2918%3A7%3C509%3A%3AAID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Z
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/bwerner/www/papers/AResource-BasedViewoftheFirm.pdf
Williams, S. D., & Williams, S. D. (2007). Gaining and losing market share and returns : a competitive dynamics model Gaining and losing market share and returns : a competitive dynamics model. Journal of Strategic Marketing ISSN:, 15, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09652540701321033
Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizeng, Economizing, and Aconomic Organization. Strategic Maiaagemnent Journal, 12, 75–94. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121007
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Taking Institutional Economics : Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2565421?seq=1
Winter, S. G. (2006). Toward A Neo-Schumpeterian Theory Of The Firm. Deloitte and Touche Professor of Management, 7(3), 1–20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj006
Yu, T., & Subramaniam, M. (2009). Rivalry Deterrence In International Markets : Contingencies Governing The Mutual Forbearance Hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 127–147. Retrieved from https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/rivalry-deterrence-in-international-markets-contingencies-governi
Zenger, T., Lazzarini, S. & Poppo, L. (2000), "Informal and formal organization in new institutional economics", Ingram, P. and Silverman, B. (Ed.) The New Institutionalism in Strategic Management (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 19), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 277-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(02)19009-7
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis JAGADITHA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).