Reinforcement of Judicial Supervision Function by Judicial Commission and Supreme Court as a Form of Shared Responsibility System

  • A Antikowati Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember
  • Mardi Handono Universitas Jember
Keywords: Supervision, Judge, Judicial Commission, Supreme Court


The function of judicial power is to enforce law and justice in the framework of protecting society through justice system based on law in a democratic state of law. One of the important principles of state of law is the existing guarantee of judicial power implementation which is independent, free from the influence of other power to implement justice for law and justice enforcement. Accountability of judge’s performance and Supreme Court institution which is a control form for justice institution becomes an idea concerning the dilema of judicial power independence concept. The supervision of judge’s behaviour by Judicial Commission can hopefully cover the weakness intern supervision by Supreme Court. The judge supervision which can be realised by Judicial Commission includes judicial technic supervision, performance assessment, and judge’s behaviour supervision. This research concerned to the reinforcement of judicial supervision function by judicial commission and Supreme Court as a form of shared responsibility system. The research method used in this research is normative law research method with statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are legislation and cases. The results of this study are: the supervision on the judge’s behavior by the Judicial Commission can hopefully cover the weakness of internal supervision by the Supreme Court. It becomes so appropriate that the suprevision on judge is also performed by the Judicial Commission, not only by the Supreme Court. The supervision on judge that can be performed by the Judicial Commission includes the suprevision of judicial technique, performance assessment, and supervision on the judge’s behavior.


Ahsin, T. (2010). Desain Konstitusional Komisi Yudisial dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. Direktorat Kenderal Peraturan Perundangundangan Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM, 7 Nomor 1.

Al, W. (1997). Hakim dan Peradilan di Indonesia, Dalam Beberapa Aspek Kajian. yogyakarta: Unika Atmajaya.

Arto, A. M. (2001). Konsepsi Ideal Mahkamah Agung. yogyakarta: Pustala Pelajar.

Čyras, V. (2007). On formalisation of the goal concept in law. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20 (5), 601–608.

Gutmann, J., & Voigt, S. (2018). The rule of law: Measurement and deep roots. European Journal of Political Economy, (April), 1–15. 1

Kedar, Y., & Hon, G. (2017). “Natures” and “Laws”: The making of the concept of law of nature – Robert Grosseteste (c. 1168–1253) and Roger Bacon (1214/1220–1292). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 61, 21–31.

Kistenkas, F. H., & Bouwma, I. M. (2018). Barriers for the ecosystem services concept in European water and nature conservation law. Ecosystem Services, 29(March 2016), 223–227.

Malikovna, B. S. (2015). Concept of Legal Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 998–1004.

Muhtadi. (2015). Problematika Yuridis Sistem Alokasi Hukum Dalam Pengawasan Hakim. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9 Nomor 2, 182–198.

Pakamanis, M. (2015). Interaction between the doctrines of forum non conveniens, judgment enforcement, and the concept of the rule of law in transnational litigation in the United States. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 1(2), 106–112.

Rahman Saleh, A. (2008). Bukan Kampung Maling, Bukan Desa Ustadz; Memoar 930 Hari di Puncak Gedung Bundar. Jakarta: PT Kompas Media Nusantara.

Rzayev, R., Agaev, F., Agamaliyev, M., & Hasanov, V. (2016). Overcoming of Semantic Uncertainty in Criterion Concepts of a Procedural Law Based on Using Fuzzy Inferences. Procedia Computer Science, 102(August), 209–216.

Sullivan, C. (2018). Digital identity – From emergent legal concept to new reality. Computer Law and Security Review, 34(4), 723–731.

Syahur, T. (n.d.). Peran Komisi Yudisial Dalam Pengawasan Hakim Terhadap Dilema Independensi Kekuasaan Hakim.

Abstract viewed = 147 times
PDF downloaded = 145 times