Influential Flows of Legal Philosophy to Jurists’ Thoughts

  • Dewa Gede Atmadja Uversitas Udayana
Keywords: Influence, Flows of Legal Philosophy, Jurists

Abstract

This paper analyzes several flows of legal philosophy that predispose the thinking of jurists/lawyers. The legal flows include law of nature, classical to modern, legal positivism, sociological jurisprudence and flow American legal realism. In detail, it can be concluded that thus far in Indonesia the dominance of the flow of legal positivism is still quite influential on the thinking of the jurists and legal practice. This study was conducted using normative legal research method. Conceptual approach and statute approach to law were used in collecting and analyzing data of this research. In the data analysis results, it was found that there are various flows of law that significantly influence the thinking of jurists and lawyers, namely Sociological Jurisprudence, Realistic Legal Realism, The Critical Jurisprudence. Thoughts of the jurists are still developing, on the one, hand in relation to the National Law Development debates whether our choice is from the political side of law, codification, modification or unification by prioritizing customary law materials or retaining the patterns of Western law, including legal justice concepts and social justice.

References

Altman, A. 2001. Arguing About Law: An Introduction to Legal Philosophy, Wardworth Publishing Company. Australia.

Atmadja, 2013. Filsafat Hukum: Dimensi Praktis & Historis. Setara Press, Malang.

Bevir, M. (2011). Histories of analytic political philosophy. History of European Ideas, 37 (3), 243–248.

Brading, K. (2015). Physically locating the present: A case of reading physics as a contribution to philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 50(1), 13–19.

Cunha, I. F. da. (2018). Constructing dystopian experience: A Neurath-Cartwrightian approach to the philosophy of social technology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 1–8.

Curzon, L. B. 1979, Jurisprudence, Hanbooks, Monald & Evan Ltd. Playmouth Great Britain.

Dimyati, K. 2005. Teorisasi Hukum: Studi Tentang Perkembangan Pemikiran Hukum Di Indonesia 1945-1990, Muhammaddiyah University Press, Surakarta.

Djokosutono, 1982. Hukum Tata Negara. Ghalia. Jakarta

Djojodigoeno. Harapan Hukum Adat Indonesia, Yayasan Badan Penerbit Gajah Mada. Yogyakarta.

Enokido, T., Barolli, V., & Takizawa, M. (2009). A legal information flow (LIF) scheduler based on role-based access control model. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 31(5), 906–912.

Gangolly, J. S., & Hussein, M. E. A. (1996). Generally accepted accounting principles: Perspectives from philosophy of law. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7(4), 383–407.

Hart, H. L. A. 1986, The Concept of Law, English Language Society, Oxford University Press.

Koesnoe, M. “Nilai-nilai Dasar Tata Hukum Indonesia”, dalam Altidjo Altkotsar, Identitas Hukum Nasional, UII University Press.

Kusumaatmadja, M. 1975, Hukum, Masyarakat dan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional: Suatu Uraian Tentang Landasan Pikiran, Pola dan Mekanisme Pembaruan Hukum di Indonesia. Lembaga Penelitian dan Krimoinologi, Fakultas Hukum Unpad.

Mackenzie, C. (2018). Feminist innovation in philosophy: Relational autonomy and social justice. Women’s Studies International Forum, 2007(December 2017), 0–1.

Manulang, E. F. 2007, Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan: Tinjauan Hukum Kodrat dan Antinomi Nilai, Buku Kompas, Jakarta.

Matthiessen, D. (2018). The rise of cryptographic metaphors in Boyle and their use for the mechanical philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 1–14.

North, A. W. 2005, Sains & Dunia Modern, Nuansa, Bandung

Rahardjo, S. 2008, Membedah Hukum Progresif, Buku Kompas, Jakarta.

Widarti, A. 2005, Hukum Berkeadilan Gender: Aksi-Interaksi Buruh Perempuan Dalam Perubhan Sosial, PT. Kompas Media Nusantara, Jakarta.

Wright, A. S. (2017). Fresnel’s laws, ceteris paribus. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 64, 38–52.

Published
2018-09-05
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 184 times
PDF downloaded = 300 times