The Legal Impact on People Died in Kasepekang Sanction

  • Ni Made Trisna Dewi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Dwijendra, Denpasar
Keywords: Pekraman Village, Law, Kesepekang Sanction

Abstract

The Pakraman village is led by village officers. The issue of how to implement the Kasepekang sanction is very important to analyse because fraud or abuse of power often occurs in this sector. Kesepekang the term of traditional sanctions in the form of a temporary dismissal as a member of the banjar and pakraman villages. Those affected by this sanction are not entitled to receive banjar service / assistance and pakraman villages. This type of research is empirical legal research oriented to the collection of empirical data in the field. Based on this empirical data the researcher conducted an in-depth analysis in accordance with the relevant theory to make conclusions. Kasepekang sanctions are given because community members do not want to solve and conduct paruman to find solutions to adat problems. Based on paruman adat leaders and community representatives prescribed on Awig-awig Number 18, paragraph 14 regarding unwritten regulations, it was decided by the village of Pakraman Pempatan and it was agreed that the person be subject to a sanction of being left unchecked. This case was motivated by civil problems continued with the existence of actions and reactions, developed into a criminal problem that is the desecration of the holy place and customary matters.

References

Ali, M., & Asrosi, M. (2014). Metodologi dan Aplikasi Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara

Astiti, T. I. P. (2010). Desa Adat Menggugat Dan Digugat. Bali: Udayana University Press

Bakri, M. (2011). Pengaturan Hukum Indonesia (Sistem Hukum Indonesia Pada Era Reformasi). Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. (2013). Pedoman Pendidikan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Denpasar

Kansil. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Masriani, Y. T. (2004). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Machmudin, D. D. (2003). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Nasution, S. (2014). Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Rahardjo, S. (2012). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rato, D. (2009). Pengantar Hukum Adat. Yogyakarta: LaksBang PresSindo

Sirtha, I. N. (2008). Aspek Hukum Dalam Konflik Adat di Bali. Bali: Udayana University Press

Sunggono, B. (2007). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo

Suryabrata, S. (2004). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Soeroso. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Syarifin, Pipin., & Chumaidy, Z. (1998). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1951 tentang kedudukan hukum pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tertang Desa.

Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2014 Tertang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 72 Tahun 2005 tentang Pembentukan Desa.

Utrecht, E. (1966). Pengantar Dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Balai Ichtiar

Windia, W. P. (2006). Pelaksanaan Sanksi Adat Kasepekang di Desa Pakraman. Makalah dalam Semiloka tentang Sanksi Adat Kasepekang yang diselenggarakan Bali Shanti LPM Unud, Denpasar

Windia, W. P. dan Sudantra Ketut. (2006). Pengantar Hukum Adat Bali. Denpasar: Lembaga Dokumentasi dan Publikasi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Windia, W. P. (1995). Menjawab Masalah Hukum. Bali: Udayana University Press

Wiratna, S. (2012). Konstitusi Ekonomi. Denpasar: Udayana University Press

Published
2021-02-25
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 128 times
PDF downloaded = 195 times