Corporate Criminal Liability in Criminal Acts on The Position in an Automotive Company
Abstract
Abstract Corporate Criminal Liability concerns the issue of liability, intentionality or negligence of the Corporation. The cases of consumers’ money embezzlement occuring in Automotive Companies in Indonesia are frequently not submitted to court. Although there were some cases that had been submitted in court and had obtained permanent legal force, the trapped party was only the members or company’. Meanwhile, the company has never been charged. This is because the Indonesia Criminal Code does not recognize legal subjects in corporation. In contrast, Criminal Code only recognizes human as subject to criminal law (Article 59 of the Criminal Code). In addition, the absence of strict regulation regulation provided on Liability of Business Actors (Company/Corporation) against consumers’ losses as stipulated in Act No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK), specifically the losses from the legal action of employees of the company and senior company officers, is also a leading factor for the development of criminal acts in corporations. The element of examining corporate as the subject to criminal acts miscunduct is difficult to implement due to its non-human nature. However, if the corporation is not demanded to provide liability just because of the difficulty of proving perpetration, impunity to corporation will occur. Keywords: Criminal Act; Corporate Criminal Liability; Penal SystemReferences
Barda, N. A. (2008). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Beaver, K. M., Schwartz, J. A., Nedelec, J. L., Connolly, E. J., Boutwell, B. B., & Barnes, J. C. (2013). Intelligence is associated with criminal justice processing: Arrest through incarceration. Intelligence, 41(5), 277–288.
Besemer, S., Ahmad, S. I., Hinshaw, S. P., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the intergenerational transmission of criminal behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 161–178.
Bernau, P. (2014). Decision and Punishment: Or Hold Bankers Responsible: Corporate Criminal Liability fromcan Economic Perspective, in Brodowski, D., et al. (eds.), Regulating Corporate Criminal Liability. Springer: Dordrecht.
Carrillo, P. E., Lopez-Luzuriaga, A., & Malik, A. S. (2018). Pollution or crime: The effect of driving restrictions on criminal activity. Journal of Public Economics, 164, 50–69.
Cuadra, L. E., Jaffe, A. E., Thomas, R., & DiLillo, D. (2014). Child maltreatment and adult criminal behavior: Does criminal thinking explain the association? Child Abuse and Neglect, 38(8), 1399–1408.
D.Schaffmeister, et al. (2007). Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Djoko Prakoso. (2010). Hukum Penintesier di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Drajat, A. (2017). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Retrieved from http://www.pn-medankota.go.id/v3/index.php/101-kumpulan-artikel/383-drajad1
González-Tapia, M. I., & Obsuth, I. (2015). “Bad genes” & criminal responsibility. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 39, 60–71.
Hamzah, A. (1987). Stelsel Pidana dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
Hamzah, A. (1991). Perkembangan Hukum Pidana Khusus. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Jonkers, J. . (1987). Buku Pedoman Hukum Pidana Hindia Belanda. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Kartanegara, S. (2001). Hukum Pidana Bagian Pertama. Jakarta: Balai Lektur Mahasiswa.
Kazemian, L., & Farrington, D. P. (2018). Advancing knowledge about residual criminal careers: A follow-up to age 56 from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 57(March), 1–10.
Kristian. (2014). Hukum Pidana Korporasi Kebijakan Integral (Integral Policy) Formulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia (First Edit). Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.
Kristian. (2016). Kejahatan Korporasi di Era Modern & Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (First Edit). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Kristian. (2017). Sistem Peranggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Konvensi Internasional. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Lamintang, P. A. . (1994). Hukum Penintesier Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Priyatno, Dwidja., & K. (2017). Kebijakan Formulasi Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan Khusus di Luar KUHP Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Priyatno, D. (2009). Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia. Bandung: Rafika Aditama.
Saleh, R. (1983). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Dua Pengertian Dasar dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
Sarira, I. (2015). Tindak Pidana Penggelapan di Perusahaan Swasta dan Lembaga Pemerintahan. Bandung: Universitas Parahiyangan.
Setiyono, H. (2002). Kejahatan Korporasi. Malang: Averroes Press.
Shofie, Y. (2011). Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi Dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Bandung: Cipta Aditya Bakti.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2006). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers.
Stephen Wormith, J., & Schafers, C. (2015). Criminality. Encyclopedia of Mental Health: Second Edition, 1, 377–387.
Widyopramono. (2012). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pattimura, Ambon.
Yunara, E. (2005). Korporasi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Berikut Studi Kasus. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Legislation
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
Law No.1 of 1946 concerning Criminal Law Rules.
Law No.8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law.
Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.
National Criminal Code Draft (RUU KUHP)
Abstract viewed = 141 times
PDF downloaded = 890 times
