The Abolishment of Fiduciary on the Object of Fiduciary in Denpasar City

  • I Kadek Setiawan Universitas Warmadewa
Keywords: Abolishment of Fiduciary, Object of Fiduciary.

Abstract

This study examines the abolishment of fiduciary listed in Articles 16 and 17 of Government Regulation Number 21 of 2015 stating that objects registered with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through online must be deleted. This is done to ensure a legal certainty for both the debtor and the creditor. The type of research used is empirical juridical research, and data used are primary data, secondary data and tertiary data. The results of data analysis show that the abolishment of fiduciary is carried out by only a part of debtors and creditors. As a result of not abolishing the fiduciary, the debtor cannot guarantee the goods or collateral objects as a fiduciary.

References

Aermadepa. (2012). Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia, Masalah dan Dilema Dalam Pelaksanaannya. Jurnal Dosen Fakultas Hukum Ummy Solok, Padang., 5(1).

Anggun, W. P. (2014). Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pemberlakuan Sistem Administrasi Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Secara Elektronik Terkait Dengan Larangan Fidusia Ulang. Artikel Ilmiah, Universitas Brawijaya Fakultas Hukum, Malang.

Carniello, B. R. (2002). The rise of an administrative elite in medieval Bologna: Notaries and popular government, 1282-1292. Journal of Medieval History, 28(4), 319–347.

Company, T., Law, F., Notary, D. A. S., & Pharmacist, A. (1918). Is Is to.

Finucane, R. C. (1987). Two notaries and their records in England, 1282-1307. Journal of Medieval History, 13(1), 1–14.

Munir, F. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia (Second Edi). Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Murray, J. M. (1986). Failure of corporation: notaries public in medieval Bruges. Journal of Medieval History, 12(2), 155–166.

Noailly, J., & Nahuis, R. (2010). Entry and competition in the Dutch notary profession. International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 178–185.

Purnamasari, I. D. (2012). Hukum Jaminan Perbankan. Jakarta: Kaifa.

Ruotsalainen, P., & Manning, B. (2007). A notary archive model for secure preservation and distribution of electrically signed patient documents. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(5–6), 449–453.

Salim, H. S. (2011). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Sari, Elsi Kartika., & Simanunsong, A. (2008). Hukum Dalam Ekonomi. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Soemitro, R. H. (1988). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Tan, K. (2006). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan yang didambakan. Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Legal Sources

Code of Civil law;

Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee;

Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position.

Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position.

Government Regulation Number 21 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Registration of Fiduciary Guarantees and Costs for Making Deed of Fiduciary Guarantee;

Government Regulation Number 45 of 2016 concerning Second Amendment to Government Regulation Number 45 of 2014 concerning Types and Tariffs of Non-Tax State Revenues Applicable to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights;

Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 09 of 2013 concerning the Application of Electronic Fiduciary Registration;

Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 10 of 2013 concerning Procedures for Registration of Fiduciary Guarantees Electronically;

Minister of Finance Regulation Number 130/PMK.010/2012 concerning Registration of Fiduciary Guarantees for Financing Companies that carry out Consumer Financing for Motorized Vehicles with Fiduciary Assignments;

Published
2018-10-16
How to Cite
Setiawan, I. K. (2018). The Abolishment of Fiduciary on the Object of Fiduciary in Denpasar City. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, 5(2), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.5.2.764.121-126
Abstract viewed = 32 times
PDF downloaded = 43 times