Ius Constituendum of Regulating Trading in Influence as a Form of Corruption Offense in Indonesia

Authors

  • I Wayan Satria Pratama Bayu Negara Airlangga University, Surabaya-Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Annisa Virgi Azzahra Airlangga University, Surabaya-Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.13.1.2026.1-8

Keywords:

corruption offense, corruption, trade in influence

Abstract

Corruption offense is an extraordinary crime that requires special handling. The modus operandi of corruption offenses always vary, and even several other forms of corruption offenses have been regulated under UNCAC, one of which is Trading in Influence. Nevertheless, Indonesia has not yet adopted Trading in Influence as a corruption offense in its positive law. This study is a legal research type that uses statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal sources employed include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which were inventoried and then analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The study aims to determine the urgency of regulating trading in influence in Indonesia and to compare the regulation of trading in influence among Indonesia, France, and Spain. The results show that, in its characteristics, trading in Influence meets the elements of a corruption offense because it involves the use of influence by an individual or a corporation toward a state administrator to obtain a benefit. The absence of explicit rules on trading in influence in the Indonesian Law on the Prevention of Corruption (UU PTPK) creates a legal gap that is exploited by corrupt actors. Indonesia has not adopted trading in influence in its positive law. Unlike countries such as France and Spain, which have clearly regulated this offense in their Penal Codes by distinguishing between active and passive actors, Indonesia needs to promptly regulate the trade of influence (Trading in Influence) as a corruption offense to close the legal gap and strengthen anti-corruption efforts.

References

Bulu, N. A., & Mustajab, W. (2022). Interpretation of a Trading-in-Influence Corruption Case from the Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v6i2.3445

Dhumillah, D. S. R., & Oktavianto, S. B. D. (2025). Konsep Relevansi Kejahatan Trading Influence dan Gratifikasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Iblam Law Review, 5(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i1.549

Effendi, E., Fernando, Z. J., Anditya, A. W., Jeffri, M., & Chandra, A. (2023). Trading in influence ( Indonesia ): A critical study Trading in influence ( Indonesia ): A critical study. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2231621

Fadhil, M., Rachman, T., & Yunus, A. (2022). Konstruksi Hukum Perdagangan Pengaruh (Trading in Influence) dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Amanna Gappa, 30(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/ag.v30i1.20952

Ferdinand, A. K., Rahmat, A. A., & Sonjaya, A. V. (2021). Perdagangan Pengaruh (Trading in Influence) dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Simbur Cahaya, 28(2), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v28i2.417

Gawi, I. R., & Imtichani, M. I. (2021). Komparasi Pengaturan Trading in Influence Antara Indonesia Dengan Berbagai Negara di Eropa. Jurnal Analisis Hukum (JAH), 4(2), 226–241. https://doi.org/https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/JAH/article/view/3129

Habeahan, G. V., Manullang, H., & Esther, J. (2025). A Comparative Study of Trading in Influence in Indonesian and Spanish Corruption Laws. JLPH: Journal of Law, Politic, and Humanities, 5(3), 1414–1424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3

Harahap, A. S., Azhari, I., & Irhamni. (2025). Urgensi Pengaturan Perdagangan Pengaruh ( Trading in Influence ) Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. Riau Law Journal, 9(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30652/chn5tm57

Herlina, M., & Handitya, B. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Perdagangan Pengaruh (Trading In Influence) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Rampai Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35473/rjh.v2i2.2597

Irza, M. Y., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2020). The Urgency of Regulating Trading in Influence as Corruption in the Indonesian Criminal Law Framework. Halu Oleo Law Review, 4(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v4i2.12209

Julia Philipp. (2009). The Criminalisation of Trading in Influence in International Anti-Corruption Laws. University of the Western Cape.

Jupriyadi, J., & Hasanah, I. (2023). In the Absence of Trading in Influence in Anti- corruption Laws?: Legal Framework within the United Nations Convention against Corruption. Lex Publica, 10(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.10.2.2023.204

Kardiat, Y., Jamaruddin, & Saprudin. (2025). Civil Servant Behavior Towards Public Service Compliance: a case study in Makassar City. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 6(3), 83–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v6i3.665

Kolono, S., & Widjajanti, E. (2024). Fenomena Treding in Influence dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Tantangan Penegakan Hukum dan Pemerintahan Indonesia. Ensiklopedia Education Review, 6(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v6i3.2846

Kumparan. (2019). KPK Asks for Regulation of Trading in Influence to be Included in the Corruption Law. Kumparan News. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/kpk-minta-pasal-perdagangan-pengaruh-diatur-di-uu-tipikor-1552967961078409624/full

Lambsdorff, J. G., & Frank, B. (2010). Bribing versus gift-giving – An experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.004

Mahmud, A., Ravena, D., Zakaria, C. A. F., Citra, D., & Ismi, W. (2024). Kriteria Trading in Influence Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Kebijakan Kriminalisasinya. USM Law Review, 7(1), 237–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8540

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Legal Research. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Omisore, B. O. (2013). Money , politics and corruption In Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 3(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v3i1.3157

Purwanto, H., & Adillah, S. U. (2021). The Recovery Of Assets Results Of Corruption Through Additional Criminal Payment Of Replacement Money. Law Development Journal, 3(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.2.261-271

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Exposing Progressive Law. Kompas.

Rumaday, M. A. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Terkait Perdagangan Pengaruh ( Trading In Influence ) Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Renaissan, 2(6), 235–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss2.art2

Saputra, A., & Mahyani, A. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Trading in Influence dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1154292.M.

Sembiring, I. S., Sudarti, E., & Najemi, A. (2020). Urgensi Perumusan Perbuatan Memperdagangkan Pengaruh sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.59-84

Setyawan, V. P. (2025). The Connection Between the Crime of Trading in Influence and Gratification in Corruption. Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary, 04(01), 20–27.

Sulaeman, M. M., Herdiansyah, O., Ansori, S., & Satory, A. (2023). Trading in Influence ( Perdagangan Pengaruh ) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Reslaj?: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 5(6), 2996–3024. https://doi.org/10.47476/reslaj.v5i6.3379

Syauket, A., & Nisa, P. G. (2025). Trading in Influence dalam Kasus Kuota Import Daging Sapi yang Melibatkan Partai Politik- Anggota Legislatif-Eksekutif serta Swasta. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 11(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v11i1.4002

United Nations. (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption. United Nations.

Viladelfia, J., & Octora, R. (2021). Urgensi Pemidanaan bagi Pelaku Perdagangan Pengaruh (Trading in Influence) dari Kalangan Non Pejabat Publik dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Dialogia Iuridica, 13(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3660

Wibowo, N. A., & Zulfiani, A. (2025). A New Modus Operandi of Corruption?: Exploring the Phenomenon of Trading in Influence in Indonesia. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 14(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v14i2.98767

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Negara, I. W. S. P. B., & Azzahra, A. V. (2026). Ius Constituendum of Regulating Trading in Influence as a Form of Corruption Offense in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.13.1.2026.1-8