Notary Staff Liability for Forgery of the Signature of the Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.12.2.2025.126-131Keywords:
forgery of authentic deed, notary staff, participation in criminal actsAbstract
A notary staff member was found to have participated in the criminal act of forgery of signatures together with the notary public on 4 Deeds of Power of Attorney to Sell. As a result, the owner of the Certificate of Ownership suffered losses. The problem in the decision focuses on the judge's decision to sentence only the notary public to a prison sentence of 1 year and 6 months and has become legally binding while the notary staff member is free from all legal charges. In fact, both the notary public and his staff were involved in the criminal act of forgery of authentic deeds. The difference in responsibility between the notary public and his staff is something that needs to be studied in relation to the implementation of the law regarding the crime of forgery of authentic deeds because the notary staff has fulfilled the requirements to be involved in the crime of forgery of deeds as regulated in the Criminal Code. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to discuss the actions of the notary staff member which constitutes a violation of the law by participating in the crime of forgery of authentic deeds. This research was conducted using normative legal research conducted through a review of literature sources. The approach applied to discuss the problems in this research is through a case approach. The method of collecting materials was carried out through library research. Data was then obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The obtained materials were then analyzed using a qualitative analysis approach.
References
Adjie, H. (2020). Problematika dan Solusi Terpilih tentang Hukum Kenotariatan Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Asufie, K. N., & Impron, A. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris Berdasarkan Teori Keseimbangan Berbasis Keadilan. Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization, 9(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v9i2.54803
Baehaqi, E. S. (2022). Keturutsertaan Dalam Tindak Pidana. An-Nadhliyyah Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 1(1), 1–10.
Fadlian, A. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Suatu Kerangka Teoritis. 5(2), 10–19.
Hariyanto, Parman, L., & Ufran. (2021). Konsep Penyertaan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencurian Menurut Kuhp. Jurnal Kerta Semaya, 9(12), 2378–2390.
Haryanto, M. (2020). Hukum Pidana (Percobaan, Penyertaan, Perbarengan, dan Pengulangan Tindak Pidana). Griya Media.
Indriet Pratiwi Wiranita Wiratmodja, & Romlan. (2022). Implementasi Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Aktivitas Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum. Justicia Journal, 11(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.32492/jj.v11i2.11202
Marzuki, P. mahmud. (2010). Penelitian Hukum (1st ed.). Kencana.
Mutriadi, A. (2021). Implikasi Perdata Terhadap Integritas Jabatan Notaris. Juripol, 4(1), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.33395/juripol.v4i1.11135
Nasution, M. A., Sembiring, R., Mulyadi, M., & Suprayitno. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Notaris (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cilacap Nomor 44/PID.B/2021/PN.CLP). Jurnal Normatif, 2(1), 106–109. https://jurnal.alazhar-university.ac.id/index.php/normatif/article/download/166/157/686
Novita Anggriani Lahabu, Rafika Nur, & Darmawati Darmawati. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Penyertaan Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(3), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i3.1660
Perdana, Y. I., Kuspriyono, T., & Warpindyastuti, L. D. (2023). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Disiplin Kerja TerhadapKinerja Karyawan Kantor Notaris Yayan Sutiati, Sh., M.Kn. Jurnal Pijar Studi Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 1(3), 356–366. https://e-journal.naureendigition.com/index.php/pmb
Pratiwi, S. (2022). Delik Penyertaan Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Binamulia Hukum, 11(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i1.677
Raihan, I., & Hertanto, H. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan Penghadap Atas Akta Kuasa Jual Beli. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v8i1.475
Rifa’i, I. J., Purwoto, A., Ramadhani, M., Muksalmina, Rusydi, M. T., Harahap, N. K., Mardiyanto, I., Churniawan, E., Junaedi, M., Agustiwi, A., Saraagih, G. M., Bariah, C., & Surasa, A. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Romlah, S. (2021). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif (Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif). Pancawahana: Jurnal Studi Islam, 16(1), 1–13.
Santriana, & Muthahir, A. (2021). Penerapan Teori Deelneming Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan Berencana. Jurnal Thengkyang, 6(1), 35–51.
Simanjuntak, S. I., & Putra, M. F. M. (2022). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan yang Dilakukan Karyawan Notaris Tanpa Sepengetahuan Notaris yang Mempekerjakannya. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 8. 1, 67–80.
Sri Devi, N. M. L., & Westra, I. K. (2021). Akibat Hukum serta Sanksi Pemalsuan yang Dilakukan Notaris Kepada Penghadap Ketika Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Acta Comitas, 6(02), 248. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p03
Suryanto, J. P. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik oleh Notaris: Studi Kasus No . 146 K / PID / 2015. 6(3), 8095–8104.
Wahyuni, F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia (M. R. Azmi (ed.); 1st ed.). PT Nusantara Persada Utama.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cestri Enggardini Budiarti, Jadmiko Anom Husodo, S. Sulistyanta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
