The Position of Crime Resolution Institutions in Indigenous Peoples in the Identity Politics Perspective

  • Blasius Mau Kau Diponegoro University
  • Hari Sutra Disemadi Diponegoro University
  • Y Yusriadi Diponegoro University
Keywords: Identity Politics, Criminal Law, Islam Economic Law

Abstract

One of the demands is to disregard modern justice institutions and utilize customary law as a means to achieve justice for those involved in a criminal offense. But on the other hand, the settlement of the case with customary law turned out to still cause injustice to the victim, and even gave birth to new crimes arising as a result of coercion carried out by the customary leaders of both parties acting as judges. This study discussed about the position of crime resolution institutions in indigenous peoples in the perspective of identity politics and the reassessing the position of crime resolution institutions in indigenous peoples, certainly cannot be separated from the recognition of identity with all the structures and positions of indigenous peoples themselves. This study was designed by using normative legal research approach. The results show that efforts to reassess the position of crime resolution institutions in indigenous peoples, of course, cannot be separated from the recognition of identity with all the structures and positions of indigenous peoples themselves. However, the dominance arising from the resolution of indigenous peoples' crimes is still determined by cultures that are patriarchal, rigid and as if forced from above so as to ignore dialogue both from perpetrators and victims, so that the measure used is the perspective of tribal leaders. However, domination is believed to restore order, order and harmony, but there is one neglected value of ethical legitimacy, namely justice. Therefore, the resolution of crimes against indigenous peoples does not all distribute justice to all parties.

 

References

Abubakar, L. (2013). Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Membangun Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.JDH.2013.13.2.213

Anjari, W. (2014). Fenomena Kekerasan sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan (Violence). E-Journal WIDYA Yustisia, 1(1), 42–51. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/246968-fenomena-kekerasan-sebagai-bentuk-kejaha-60c284aa.pdf

Arif, B. N. (2018). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Semarang: Kencana Prenada media Grup.

Astuti, G. F. Y. (2015). Relevansi Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 10(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v10i2.4953

Budianto, E. T. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Hak-Hak Masyarakat Adat (Studi Masyarakat Adat Di Kecamatan Lindu Kabupaten Sigi). Katalogis, 4(4), 137–145. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/147042-ID-implementasi-kebijakan-hak-hak-masyaraka.pdf

Gahral, A. D. (2006). Demokrasi Kami. Depok: Kokoesan.

Guttman, A. (1994). Multiculturalisme: Examining the Politicks of Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Harahap, A. (2018). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Berbasis Hukum Adat. Jurnal Edutech, 4(2), 1–9. Retrieved from http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/edutech/article/view/2268

Hidayati, M. (2008). Jurang diantara Kita. Yogjakarta: Kanisius.

Kamaruddin, K. (2013). Model Penyelesaian Konflik di Lembaga Adat. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 21(1), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.2013.21.1.236

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (1998). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Ode, S. (2015). Budaya Lokal Sebagai Media Resolusi Dan Pengendalian Konflik Di Provinsi Maluku (Kajian,Tantangan Dan Revitalisasi Budaya Pela). Politika, 6(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.6.2.2015.93-100

Safrijal, A. (2013). Penerapan Sanksi Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana di Kabupaten Nagan Raya. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(59), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v15i1.6165

Saraswati, P. S. (2015). Fungsi Pidana dalam Menanggulangi Kejahatan. Jurnal Advokasi, 5(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Simarmata, R. (2006). Pengakuan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat di Indonesia. Jakarta: UNDP.

Soepomo. (1967). Bab-bab Tentang Hukum Adat. Jakarta: PT. Paradya Paramita.

Suartha, I. D. M. (2015). Hukum dan sanksi Adat Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Malang: Setara Press.

Suseno, F. M. (1987). Etika Politik: Prinsip-prinsip moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia.

Tamarasari, D. (2002). Pendekatan Hukum Adat dalam Menyelesaikan Konflik Masyarakat pada Daerah Otonom. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 2(I), 37–47. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/4219/pendekatan-hukum-adat-dalam-menyelesaikan-konflik-masyarakat-pada-daerah-otonom

Published
2020-09-21
How to Cite
Kau, B. M., Disemadi, H. S., & Yusriadi, Y. (2020). The Position of Crime Resolution Institutions in Indigenous Peoples in the Identity Politics Perspective. Jurnal Hukum Prasada, 7(2), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.7.2.1224.79-84
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 28 times
PDF downloaded = 18 times