SUSTAINABILITY BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT DENGAN KINERJA SISTEM INFORMASI AKUNTANSI KEBERLANJUTAN

  • sri purnama Universitas Dhyana Pura
  • Putu Aristya Adi Wasita Fakultas Bisnis Pariwisata Pendidikan dan Humaniora
  • I Made Dwi Wira Ardana Fakultas Bisnis Pariwisata Pendidikan dan Humaniora
Keywords: pemangku kepentingan, sistem informasi akuntansi keberlanjutan, teori kontingensi, strategi perusahaan

Abstract

This study aims to examine the development of a sustainability accounting information system based on contingency theory. In today's digital era, BPRs face many data sets, including financial and non-financial data. However, empirical evidence is still scarce on how sustainability issues are linked or integrated into the company's internal information system. The initial data used in this study came from 80 respondents from BPRs in Badung Regency. The results show that there is a significant relationship between stakeholder engagement, especially internal stakeholders, and sustainability accounting information systems; most of the surveyed BPRs include sustainability strategies as core BPR strategies; however, there is no relationship between sustainability accounting information systems and BPR strategies, and firm size does not moderate sustainability accounting information systems with BPR strategies.  The limitation of this study relates to the small sample size, which only uses respondents from BPRs in Badung Regency. The results of this study are important to encourage the social responsibility of BPRs by developing a sustainability accounting information system.

References

Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.05.002

Adams, C. A., Muir, S., & Hoque, Z. (2014). Measurement of sustainability performance in the public sector. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2012-0018

Al-Eqab, M., & Ismail, N. (2011). Contingency Factors and Accounting Information System Design in Jordanian Companies. IBIMA Business Review, December, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5171/2011.166128

Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., & Frame, B. (2009). Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(4), 588–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910955452

Bebbington, J., Kirk, E. A., & Larrinaga, C. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.01.001

Carroll, A. B. (1995). Stakeholder Thinking in Three Models of Management Morality: A Perspective with Strategic Implications. Helsinki, Finland: LSR- Publications, 47–74. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442673496-010

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28, 28, 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5024417

Dagiliene, L., & Šutiene, K. (2019). Corporate sustainability accounting information systems: a contingency-based approach. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(2), 260–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2018-0200

Dewi, P. N. S., Candiasa, I. M., & Dantes, G. R. (2018). Perencanaan Strategis Sistem Informasi/Teknologi Informasi (Studi Kasus: PT. BPR Jaya Kerti). Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Indonesia (JIKI), 3(1), 32–43.

Dillard, J., Yuthas, K., & Baudot, L. (2016). Dialogic framing of accounting information systems in social and environmental accounting domains: Lessons from, and for, microfinance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 23, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.10.001

Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001

Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00084-X

Fortainer, F., Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2011). Harmonization in CSR reporting MNE and Global CSR Standars. MIR: Management International Review, 51(5), 665–696.

Gond, J. P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003

Gordon, L. A., & Miller, D. (1976). A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(76)90007-6

Gordon, L. A., & Narayanan, V. K. (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90028-X

Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability...and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006

Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(3–4), 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00376

Higgins, C., Milne, M. J., & van Gramberg, B. (2015). The Uptake of Sustainability Reporting in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2171-2

Horváth, P., Pütter, J. M., Haldma, T., Lääts, K., Dimante, D., Dagilienė, L., Kochalski, C., Ratajczak, P., Wagner, J., Petera, P., Paksǐová, R., Tirnitz, T., Sucală, V.-I., Sava, A., Rejc Buhovac, A., Osmanagić Bedenik, N., & Labaš, D. (2017). Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies: Results of an International and Empirical Study. Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies: international Empirical Insights, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52578-5_15

Kerr, J., & Rouse, P. (2015). Sustainability reporting integrated into management control. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 189–207.

Lubis, M. F., Azizah, D., Marayke, I., & Natasyah, N. (2021). Perancangan Sistem Informasi Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit PT. BPR Duta Pakuan Mandiri Cabang Tangerang. Adi Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin, 2(1), 1–11.

Lucianetti, L., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Gunasekaran, A., & Latan, H. (2018). Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: Effects on organizational measurement systems and firms’ performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.005

Maas, K., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016). Advancing the integration of corporate sustainability measurement, management and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 859–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.006

Mäkelä, H., Gibbon, J., & Costa, E. (2017). Social Enterprise, Accountability and Social Accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1287583

Maletič, M., Maletič, D., & Gomišček, B. (2018). The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.172

Manalu, G. S. M., & Yadnyana, I. K. (2021). Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi, Efektivitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Sistem Pengendalian Intern dan Kinerja Karyawan BPR Kabupaten Gianyar. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2021.v31.i02.p04

Morton, N. A., & Hu, Q. (2008). Implications of the fit between organizational structure and ERP: A structural contingency theory perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28(5), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.008

Narayanan, V., & Adams, C. A. (2017). Transformative change towards sustainability: the interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practices. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 344–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1257930

Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980-2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001

Otley, D. T. (1980). The Contingency Theory og Management Accounting: Achievement and Prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413–428.

Pryshlakivsky, J., & Searcy, C. (2017). A Heuristic Model for Establishing Trade-Offs in Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2806-y

Reinking, J. (2012). Contingency theory in information system research”, in Dwivedi, Y., Wade, M. and Schneberger, S. (Eds). Springer, 28(May), 461. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0

Schaltegger, S., & Hörisch, J. (2017). In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking? Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3

Shabana, K. M., Buchholtz, A. K., & Carroll, A. B. (2017). The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Business and Society, 56(8), 1107–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316628177

Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007

Soderstrom, K. M., Soderstrom, N. S., & Stewart, C. R. (2017). Sustainability/csr research in management accounting: A review of the literature. Advances in Management Accounting, 28, 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120170000028003

Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2016-0046

Swara, L. G. I. P., & Widhiyani, N. L. S. (2019). Pengaruh Komitmen Manajemen, Kemampuan Teknik Personal Dan Information Technology Sophistication Pada Kinerja Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 28, 694. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v28.i01.p27

Talbot, D., & Boiral, O. (2018). GHG reporting and impression management: An assessment of sustainability reports from the energy sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2979-4

Vidal, N., Kozak, R. A., & Hansen, E. (2015). Adoption and Implementation of Corporate Responsibility Practices: A Proposed Framework. Business and Society, 54(5), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312464028

Weill, P., & Olson, M. H. (1989). An Assesment Of The Contingency Theory Of MIS. Journal of Management Information Systems, 6(1), 59–85.

Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 196, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.057

Wijethilake, C., Munir, R., & Appuhami, R. (2017). Strategic responses to institutional pressures for sustainability: The role of management control systems. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(8), 1677–1710. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2144

Zyznarska-Dworczak, B. (2018). The development perspectives of sustainable management accounting in central and Eastern European countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051445

Published
2024-01-28
How to Cite
purnama, sri, Wasita, P. A. A., & Ardana, I. M. D. W. (2024). SUSTAINABILITY BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT DENGAN KINERJA SISTEM INFORMASI AKUNTANSI KEBERLANJUTAN. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 15(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.15.2.2024.187-198
Abstract viewed = 130 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 15 times