Kekuatan Pembuktian Laporan Hasil Analisis Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK) Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Authors

  • I Nengah Nuarta Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia
  • Ketut Krisna Hari Bagaskara P Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.6.2.2025.255-264

Keywords:

Authority, PPATK, Money Laundering

Abstract

The Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in carrying out its duties to combat money laundering, conducts the stages of analysis and examination of reports or information related to financial transactions. In an effort to accelerate the prevention of money laundering, the President has directed the optimization of the use of the Analysis Results Reports of the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center. Based on this background, the researcher is interested in examining the following matters: 1. What is the authority of the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in proving money laundering crimes currently? 2. How will the authority of the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) to prove money laundering crimes be reformulated in the future? This research is a normative legal research. This approach is carried out by presenting the collected legal materials, which are then analyzed in a manner consistent with their nature, namely descriptively, evaluatively, and prescriptively. The PPATK's authority to prove money laundering crimes is currently regulated under several laws and regulations in Indonesia, including Law Number 8 of 2010, Presidential Regulation Number 50 of 2011 concerning Procedures for Implementing the Authority of the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center, and Presidential Instruction Number 2 of 2017 concerning Optimizing the Utilization of Analysis Reports and Examination Reports from the Reporting Center. Reformulation of PPATK's evidentiary authority regarding money laundering in the future by interpreting the position of PPATK’s Analysis Results Reports (LHA) as documentary or electronic evidence.

References

Adhami Chazawi, 2008, Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Alumni, Bandung.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2003, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Andi Hamzah, 2008, Perbandingan Pemberantasan Korupsi di Berbagai Negara, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Anisa Fitri, 2018, Tinjauan Yuridis Laporan Hasil Analisis Oleh Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Berdasarkan Instruksi Presiden Nomor 2 Tahun 2017, JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Vol.5, No. 2.

Christian Sondakh, 2015, Kewenangan Ppatk Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010, Jurnal Lex Crimen, Vol.4, No.8.

Hanafi Amrani, 2015, Hukum Pidana Pencucian Uang (Perkembangan Rezim Anti Pencucian Uang dan Implikasinya Terhadap Prinsip Dasar Kedaulatan Negara, Yuridiksi Pidana dan Penegakan Hukum, UII Pers, Yogyakarta.

Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, 2004, Kriminalisasi Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering), makalah disampaikan pada Video Conference Nasional yang diselenggarakan oleh PPATK, BI, UI, UGM, USU, UNDIP, UNAIR, dan ELIPS, Jakarta.

Ivan Yustiavandana, 2014, Pelaksanaan Kewenangan PPATK-BAPEPAM-LK/OJK Atas Dugaan Tindak Pidana Pasar Modal Sebagai Predicate Crime TPPU, Disertasi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Jakarta Press, Rekening Gendut PNS Untuk Danai Politik, https://m.jakartapress.com/read/detail/8425, diakses 12 Agustus 2025.

Juni Sjafrien Jahja, 2012, Melawan Money laundering (mengenal, mencegah, & memberantas Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang), Visimedia, Jakarta.

M.Yusuf, 2012, Kebijakan Hukum Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia, Disertasi, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung.

Muhammad Rusli, 2007, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Oci Senjaya, 2016, An Overview Juridical On The Evidence To Countermeasures The Crime Of Money Laundering, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De'jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, Vol.1, No.1.

PAF Lamintang, & Theo Lamintang, 2013, Pembahasan KUHAP Menurut Ilmu Pengetahuan & Yurisprudensi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

PPATK, 2017, Laporan Tahunan PPATK, PPATK, Jakarta.

Wisnubroto & G. Widiartana, 2005, Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Yenti Garnasih, 2004, Kriminalisasi Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Disertasi, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Nuarta, I. N., & Bagaskara P, K. K. H. (2025). Kekuatan Pembuktian Laporan Hasil Analisis Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK) Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 6(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.6.2.2025.255-264