Gugatan Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) dalam Gugatan Cerai Gugat di Pengadilan Agama Badung

I Gusti Agung Ketut Bagus Wira Adi  Putra; Ida Ayu Putu  Widiati; Ni Made Puspasutari  uj

doi:10.22225/jkh.2.1.2565.305-309

I Gusti Agung Ketut Bagus Wira Adi Putra
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati Univesitas Warmadewa
Ni Made Puspasutari uj Univesitas Warmadewa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2565.305-309

Keywords: Divorce, Lawsuit Is Not Acceptable, The Verdict

Abstract

In the course of the household, there are always disputes between husband and wife that cannot be resolved and lead to divorce. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of an unacceptable lawsuit in a lawsuit divorce case in decision number 0063 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Bdg and to find out that the judge's consideration in deciding a lawsuit cannot be accepted in a divorce suit in decision number 0063 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PA.Bdg. This study uses a normative legal research method with a case approach. The results of the study show that in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage in Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law and its explanation it states that divorce can be carried out if it is in accordance with predetermined reasons. An unacceptable decision (NO) is a decision stating that a lawsuit cannot be accepted, because of formal defects. Then, the reasons that cause the lawsuit to be unacceptable due to formal defects are invalid power of attorney, lawsuit filed by parties who have no legal interest, in person error suit, lawsuit beyond competence, lawsuit against libel, premature lawsuit and lawsuit expired. Libel's lawsuit is vague or unclear and the cause of obscuur libel's lawsuit in this case is an incomplete petitum, therefore the lawsuit cannot be accepted

References

Artono, M. (2011). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Duesenberg, R. w. (1959). Jurisdiction of Civil Court. OHIO State Law Journal, 20, 508–548.

Kusmayanti, H., & Puteri, S. A. (2020). Dispute Settlement Practices through the Religious Court’s Mobile Court (Sidang Keliling). FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(3), 287.

Mantili, R., & Lubis, S. A. (2017). Pertimbangan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Terhadap Gugatan Perceraian yang Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) dalam Praktik. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 3(1).

Melayu, H. A. (2013). The Religious Court In Indonesia: A Preliminary Overview of Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh. Journal of Islamic Civilization in Southeast Asia, 1(1), 55–77.

Mirsultan, A. (2020). Divorce settlement among the Uyghurs during the Republican era in Xinjiang. Central Asian Survey, 0(0), 1–18.

Popa, M., & Andreescu, L. (2017). Legal provisions, courts, and the status of religious communities: a socio-legal analysis of inter-religious relations in Romania. Religion, State and Society, 45(3–4), 297–316.

Wirawan, I. P. W., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Putusan Pengadilan Agama Badung Nomor 0166/Pdt.G/2017/Pa.Bdg tentang Cerai Gugat karena Salah Satu Pihak Berbeda Agama. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(2), 133–138.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 tahun 1975 Tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor. 1 Tahun 1974.