Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Kawin terhadap Pihak Ketiga dalam Perspektif Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015
Property problems in marriage often occur. With this, the couple can make a marriage agreement for those who want to separate their marital assets. One of the marriage agreement arrangements, which is mentioned in paragraph (1), namely in Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage states that a marriage agreement can be made before the marriage takes place and binds a third party as long as the third party is involved. However, after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 the arrangement of the agreement in marriage has changed. This study aims to determine the arrangement of the marriage agreement after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015 and knowing the legal consequences for third parties with the existence of a marriage agreement after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015. The research method used is the Normative research method where the assessment is based on legal materials from the existing literature. The results of the analysis show that the marriage agreement arrangements have changed since the Constitutional Court Decision, where the amendment is that the marriage agreement can be made before or after marriage, applies after marriage unless the parties determine otherwise, and also the marriage agreement can be changed and revoked according to the agreement of the husband and wife. . If the agreement in marriage is registered, the agreement will be enforced for the third party. Couples who want to make a marriage agreement should follow the existing rules so that the marriage agreement is valid and does not harm third parties.
Chen, S., & van Ours, J. C. (2020). Symbolism Matters: The effect of Same-Sex Marriage Legalization on Partnership Stability. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 178, 44–58.
Dwinopianti, E. (2017). Implikasi dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/Puu-Xiii/2015 terhadap Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Kawin yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 2(1), 16–34.
Efevbera, Y., & Farmer, P. (2019). ‘It is this which is Normal’ A Qualitative Study on Girl Child Marriage and Health in Conakry, Guinea. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(2), 1–9.
Hartanto, A. (2010). Hukum Harta Kekayaan Perkawinan (Menurut Burgerlijk Wetboek dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan). Yogyakarta: Laksbang Grafika.
Kenny, L., Koshin, H., Sulaiman, M., & Cislaghi, B. (2019). Adolescent-led Marriage in Somaliland and Putland: A Surprising Interaction of Agency and Social Norms. Journal of Adolescence, 72(January), 101–111.
Kern, H. L. (2010). The political Consequences of Transitions out of Marriage in Great Britain. Electoral Studies, 29(2), 249–258.
Kiconco, A., & Nthakomwa, M. (2018). Marriage for the ‘New Woman’ from the Lord’s Resistance Army: Experiences of Female Ex-abductees in Acholi Region of Uganda. Women’s Studies International Forum, 68(July 2017), 65–74.
Minten, M. J., & Dykeman, C. (2020). The Impact of a Marriage Checkup with Transgender Couples. Sexologies, 1–7.
Prawirohamidjojo, S. (2000). Hukum Orang dan Keluarga. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok – Pokok Agraria dan Undang – Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan terhadap UUD 1945.
Undang – Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan
Undang – Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 perubahan atas Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris