Alternatif Pembenahan Muatan Materi Rancangan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Melalui Policy Screening Tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.7.1.2026.36-46Keywords:
draft regional regulation, improvement, policy screening toolsAbstract
Indonesia is a state based on the rule of law, and one of the characteristics of such a state is that all policies issued by the government must be grounded in applicable legal norms. The hierarchy of legislation in Indonesia does not consist solely of laws (undang-undang); at the lowest level, there are still district/municipal regulations (peraturan daerah kabupaten/kota). Indonesia is experiencing a crisis in the legislative process, which has led to several laws and regulations receiving criticism and even rejection from the public. This situation is alarming, especially if the legislative process continues in this manner in the future. Law, which should function as social control, has instead become a source of new problems and is ineffective because it fails to accommodate the interests of society. This study is qualitative research using a sociological legal approach, focusing on understanding the procedures for forming laws and regulations using the Policy Screening Tools in the Secretariat General of the Provincial DPRD in Bali and Aceh. Policy Screening Tools serve as a policy analysis instrument that can act as a parameter to determine whether a draft regional regulation is suitable or unsuitable to be enacted. Not all draft laws and regional regulations undergo screening—only those draft laws and regulations that face contention among the legislature, the executive, and the public are subjected to the screening process.
References
Ashofa, Burhan. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
BBC.com. Omnibus Law: Demo Tolak UU Cipta Kerja di 18 Provinsi Diwarnai Kekerasan, YLBHI: Polisi Melakukan Pelanggaran. BBC News 9 Oktober 2020, https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-54469444 diakses pada 22 November 2023
Penjore, Dorji. (2008). GNH Screening Tool. Thimpu: Centre for Bhutan Studies.
Dwidjowijoto, Riant Nugroho. (2006). Kebijakan Publik untuk Negara-Negara Berkembang. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Fios, Frederikus, (2012). Keadilan Hukum Jeremy Bentham dan Relevansinya bagi Praktik Hukum Kontemporer, Jurnal Humaniora, 3(1): 302
Gutmadd, Amy, Dennis Thompson, (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy?. United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
Humas Setkab. Kemendagri Resmi Umumkan 3.143 Perda yang Dibatalkan https://setkab.go.id/kemendagri-resmi-umumkan-3-143-perda-yang-dibatalkan/ dikutip tanggal 31 Oktober 2024
Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/amp/english/screening. Diakses pada 03 November 2024
Ibrahim, Anis. (2008).Legislasi dalam Perspektif Demokrasi: Analisis Interaktif Politik dan Hukum dalam Proses Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah di Jawa Timur. Disertasi, program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Jayuska, Rizki. Ismail Marzuki. (2021). Problematika Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah oleh Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah Periode 2016-2021, Pagaruyuang Law Jurnal, 4(2): 154.
Kholifah, Ayu. (2022). Pembenahan Muatan Kebijakan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Melalui Policy Screening Tool Terhadap Rancangan Undang-Undang, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19 (2), 158.
Khopiatuziadah. (2014). Peluang dan Tantangan Konsultasi Publik dalam Proses Penyusunan Naskah Akademik dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Usul Inisiatif DPR. Rechts Vinding Online.
Lexy, Moleong. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhtadi. (2013). Tiga Landasan Keberlakuan Peraturan Daerah (Studi Kasus Raperda Penyertaan Modal Pemerintah Kota Bandar Lampung Kepada Perusahaan Air Minum “Way Rilau” Kota Bandar Lampung). Fiat Justicia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2): 212-222.
Musikanski, Laura, (2014). Happiness in Public Policy. Journal of Social Change, 6(1): 57.
Ramadhan, Fitra Moerat, Demo Revisi UU KPK Berujung Rusuh, Ada 1.365 Orang Ditangkap,Tempo.co. 15 Oktober 2019,https://grafis.tempo.co/read/1851/demo-revisi-uu-kpk-berujung-rusuh-ada-1-365-orang-ditangkap diakses pada 22 November 2023
Riskiyono, Joko, (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan. Jurnal Aspirasi, 6 (2): 167
Sonnenberg, Stephan, Kristen DeRemer, (2021). GNH and Justice: A framework for Rile of law Development Efforts in Bhutan. The Journal of Gross National Happines and Law, 1.
Syaifullah, Yunan, (2019). Modul Pelatihan dan Pembelajaran Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Malang: UMM Press.
Thinley, Jigmi Y. (2012). What is Gross National Happiness?, Thimpu: Centre for Bhutan Studies.
Todaro, Michael P, Stephen C. Smith. (2011). Pembangunan Ekonomi, edisi ke 11 jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Wahyuningsih, Rutiana Dwi. (2011). Membangun Kepercayaan Publik melalui Kebiajakan Sosial Inklusif, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 15 (1).
Walker, Warren E., (1986). The Use of Screening in Policy Analysis, Management Science, 23 (4):389.
Yanka, Dorji et.all, (2018). Carbon Neutral Policy in Action: The Case of Bhutan. Climate Policy, DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1551187
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanif Hardianto, Megafury Apriandhini, Nina Farliana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





