Rekonstruksi Desain Pemilu Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024

Authors

  • I Gede Druvananda Abhiseka Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Bali
  • I Gusti Agung Dian Hendrawan Universitas Jember, Jawa Timur
  • M.Arief Amrullah Universitas Jember, Jawa Timur
  • Fendi Setyawan Universitas Jember, Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.7.1.2026.1-10

Keywords:

constitutional court, electoral simultaneity, judicial activism

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 marks a significant shift in Indonesia’s constitutional design, particularly regarding the regulation of simultaneous elections. The Court separated national and local elections with a two-year interval, serving as a constitutional correction for the legislature’s failure to implement Decision No. 55/PUU-XVII/2019. Although the Court lacks legislative authority, this action reflects the theory of judicial activism, which permits courts to undertake constitutional correction when political institutions neglect their constitutional duties. From the perspective of democratic theory, this ruling strengthens the principles of substantive democracy over mere procedural democracy, emphasizing voter rationality and deliberative participation. Normatively, this study employs a constitutional interpretation and judicial behavior analysis approach to assess the Court’s reasoning and legitimacy. The findings indicate that the decision does not constitute an ultra vires act but rather a constitutional measure to preserve substantive democracy and the functionality of Indonesia’s presidential system. Consequently, the legislature must redesign the electoral simultaneity framework to ensure democratic efficiency, governance continuity, and systemic balance between presidential and parliamentary dynamics.

References

Ahmad, Andi. “Analysis of the Legal Outputs of State Institutions: The Case of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.” Enigma in Law 1, no. 2 (2023): 36–40, DOI: https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v1i2.35

Ali, Chaidir, and Refi Meidiantama. “Upholding The Erga Omnes Principle: The Role Of Constitutional Court Decisions in The Formation of Indonesia’s New Penal Code: Meneguhkan Prinsip Erga Omnes: Peran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pembentukan KUHP Baru Indonesia.” Constitutional Law Society 4, no. 1 (2025): 18–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36448/cls.v4i01.102

Arrsa, Ria Casmi. “Pemilu Serentak Dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 3 (2014): 515–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1136

Bangas, Karlinae D, Eny Susilowati, and Fuji Syifa Safari. “The Configuration of Electoral Design in Indonesia Following the Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Concerning the Separation of the Implementation of National Elections and Local Elections.” Fox Justi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 03 (2025): 960–70.

Darmadi, Nanang Sri. “Kedudukan Dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Unissula 26, no. 2 (2017): 12287.

Dewi, Maharani Citra, and John Elvin Louis. “Building Deliberative Democracy in Indonesia: Democracy Future and the Future of Democracy.” Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum 5, no. 1 (2025): 1–26.

Faisyah, Nur, Muchamad Ali Safa’at, and Riana Susmayanti. “Constitutional Parameters of Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” International Journal of Business, Law, and Education 6, no. 1 (2025): 724–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1073

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Dimensi Judicial Activism Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 2 (2016): 406–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1328

Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. “Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris, Cetakan IV.” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

Fatullah, Ahmad Ari, M Maghfur Agung, and Rahmah Meladiah. “Implikasi Konstitusional Dan Sistemik: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional Dan Pilkada.” ELQONUN: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan 3, no. 1 (2025): 37–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19109/1qg9pc52.

Hanan, Djayadi, Tri Sulistianing Astuti, and Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono. “Electoral Reform Through the Indonesian Constitutional Court: Constitutionality of Presidential Candidacy Threshold in Indonesia: Reformasi Elektoral Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi: Konstitutionalitas Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 2 (2025): 260–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2223

Ismaidar, Ismaidar, Tamaulina Br Sembiring, and Raja Arsyadil Fiqry Siregar. “Decision Factors Court Constitution Related Results Election President 2024 Against Indonesian Politics and Law.” International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2, no. 1 (2025): 14–21. DOI : https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v2i1.151

Kahn-Freund, Otto. “On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law.” Mod. L. Rev. 37 (1974): 1. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20880.51200.

Mayasari, Fil. “ANalisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/Puu-Xxii/2024 Tentang Pemisahan Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Perspektik Hukum Progresif.” IAIN SALATIGA, 2025.

Mulyadi, Widiarti. “Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Dan Pilkada Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 55/PUU-XVII/2019.” Lex Privatum 12, no. 3 (2023).

Rajagukguk, Kadir Johnson, Sofjan Aripin, and Heri Wahyudi. “Simultaneous General Election: It Is Fair for Democracy in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan: Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah 6, no. 1 (2021): 56–64.

Rifa’i, Iman Jalaludin, and Abdullah Abdullah. “The Role of Law in Strengthening Democratic Governance.” Journal of Law and Social Politics 3, no. 2 (2025): 80–87.

Salam, Shelli Nur. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Demokrasi Di Indonesia:Studi Yuridis-Normatif.” Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 3, no. 1 (2025): 788–806.

Seran, Gotfridus Goris. “Konstitusionalitas Dan Desain Pemilukada Langsung Serentak Nasional.” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 3 (2019): 655–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk16310

Sulastri, Dewi, Firdaus Arifin, Anthon F Susanto, Uu Nurul Huda, and Mohd Zakhiri Md Nor. “Institutional Integrity and Challenges in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Institution.” Jurnal Media Hukum 32, no. 1 (2025): 40–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v32i1.24100

Published

2026-05-18