Pengaturan Perubahan Kesalahan Kata Pada Penulisan Komparisi Akta Notaris

Authors

  • Putu Indira Yustika Kusuma Dewi Program Studi Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Novy Purwanto Program Studi Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.6.2.2025.340-346

Keywords:

Arrangements, changes, deed comparison

Abstract

Correction of errors in writing the "komparisi" must follow the procedures stipulated in the applicable laws and regulations, as essentially what is contained in an authentic deed must be accurate to maintain the power of the authentic deed as evidence. This is the duty of the Notary because the Notary must ensure that the documents of the appearing parties, such as identities and supporting evidence, are correct. The purpose of this writing is to understand the regulatory provisions for changing errors in the writing of the "komparisi" in deeds and the legal impacts on Notaries and the parties involved if errors in the "komparisi" writing are not promptly corrected. This journal uses a normative legal research method, including legislative, conceptual, and analytical approaches, due to ambiguities in the norms. The result of this research is that if there are typographical errors in the "komparisi," the Notary corrects them through the renvooi mechanism before the deed is signed or by a correction (ralat) after signing, following the UUJN procedures with the consent of the parties, even though the change of errors in the "komparisi" is not explicitly regulated. The legal impact on the parties for such errors, if not immediately corrected, is that the deed will be degraded to a private deed, and the responsible Notary may be subject to civil, administrative, and criminal sanctions.

References

Atmosudirjo, Prajudi. (1995). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta.

Arsy, E. A., Widhiyanti, H. N., & Ruslijanto, P. A. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Cacat Hukum Dan Tidak Sesuai Dengan Ketentuan Pembuatan Akta Dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(1).

Aldi, Y.P. (2022). Analisis Bentuk Komparisi Dalam Akta Autentik Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Pembuktian. Diponogoro Private Law Review. 9(2).

Budiawan., dan Sesung Rusdianto. (2017). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris yang Mengandung Kesalahan dalam Penulisan Komparisi. Jurnal Al-qanun, 20(2).

Dyani, V. A. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Membuat Party Acte. Lex Renaissance, 2(1).

Legianty, A, F., Yunanto, & Irawati. (2019). Pernjanjian Jual Beli Tanah yang Melanggar Asas Nemo Plus Juris pada Pendaftaran Tanah, Jurnal Notarius, 12(2).

Mardiyah, M., Setiabudhi, I. K. R., & Swardhana, G. M. (2017). Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Melanggar Kewajiban Dan Larangan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (Doctoral dissertation, Udayana University)

Mudofir Hadi, 1991, Varia Peradilan Tahun VI nomor 72, Pembatalan Isi Akta Notaris Dengan Putusan Hakim,

Prahardika, B., R., & Kawuryan, S., E. (2018). Tanggung Gugat Notaris Atas Kelalaian Dalam Membuat Akta Perjanjian Kredit Bank, Jurnal Transparansi Hukum, 1(1).

Puspitasari, I. (2021). Hukum Kenotariatan di Indonesia. Prenada Media, Jakarta.

Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Simanjuntak, S.I. (2022). Akibat hukum terhadap pemalsuan tanda tangan yang dilakukan karyawan notaris tanpa sepengetahuan notaris yang memperkerjakannya. Jurnal komunikasi hukum, 8(1).

Published

2025-12-01