Violation Maxim of Principle Cooperation in Indonesian Lawyers Club Presidential Debate Event
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.11.1.2025.259-269Keywords:
Pragmatic, Violation Maxim of Principle Cooperation, Indonesia Lawyers ClubAbstract
This research is motivated by 4 violations maxim principle of cooperation consisting maxim quantity, maxim of quality, maxim of relevance and maxim of implementation/manner that occurred in Indonesian Lawyers Clubs President debate event. The issue in this study is how principle of cooperation was violated in Indonesia Lawyers Club Presidential Debate Event. The purpose of this study is to describe violations maxim of cooperation and it is hoped that in the future, in speaking, values contained in 4 maxims can be applied and it employs a qualitative approach using the content analysis method. The data used in this study are all speeches made by host and resources persons during event, and researcher collected data using note-taking, listening, and documentation techniques. The researcher used content analysis as method of data analysis. The qualitative approach is related to content analysis method because both have aim of understanding content of research and emphasize the theoretical approach to research object, so that approach is relevant to this research because research combines opinions of several experts. the results showed that there were 54 data points on violation principle of cooperation in the Indonesia Lawyers Club Presidential Debate event. The researcher grouped violations into four Grice's maxims of principle of cooperation that had been violated, consisting of 26 data on maxim of quantity, 1 data on maxim of quality, 13 data on maxim of relevance, 14 data on maxim of implementation / manner and there are 2 data that violate in one data where two data have been entered into total number of data analysis. The violations that often occur are violations maxim of quantity, this occurs because participants in speech in the event convey information beyond what interlocutor wants. The violations that often occur are violations maxim of quantity. This occurs because the participants in event convey information that interlocutor does not want, such as when expressing their opinions they often exaggerate. The conclusion of this study, from the 4 maxims have an important role in event of speech, especially in object that the researcher took, but here researcher emphasizes that the application of these 4 maxims, cannot always be applied in cultural values of Indonesian society because they only apply in certain situations and conditions. This is because Indonesian society still upholds the values of friendliness and politeness
References
Amalia, R. N., Retnowaty, & Maulida, N. (2019). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama Dalam Acara Talk Show Rosi di Kompas Tv. Kompetensi, 12(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.36277/kompetensi.v12i2.28
Bungin, B. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.
Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Citra, Y., & Fatmawati. (2021). Alasan Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama Grice dalam Program Mata Najwa di Trans 7. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 7(2), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v7i2.1278
Elfianora, F. (2023). Prinsip Kerjasama dalam Tuturan Guru di SMAN 3 Gunung Sahilan Kabupaten Kampar Riau. Literasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah, 13(2), 700–701.
Fatmawati, N. &. (2024). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif dalam Perspektif Cyberpragmatics. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 10(1).
Hermawati, Rina, Didin Sahidin, A. L. (2021). Maksim Kerja Sama pada Tuturan Host dan Bintang Tamu dalam Deddy’s Corner. Caraka, 10(3), 153–159.
ILC Management. (2021). Debat Presidential Threshold 20% // Cara Menjegal Capres Non Partai?! - Indonesia Lawyers Club. Youtube Indonesia Lawyers Club. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-0hRCISnZY&t=2293s
Leech, G. (2021). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Depok: Universitas Indonesia (UI Press).
Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nadar, F. (2009). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Ningsih, A. (2024). Tindak Tutur Direktif pada Kolom Komentar TikTok Ganjar Pranowo tentang Pungli. Jurnal Genre, 6(1).
Ningsih, B. S. & R. (2023). Implikatur Percakapan Dalam “Web Seriesnya Radit” Tayangan YouTube Raditya Dika. Jurnal Sinestesia, 13(1).
Ningsih, F. &. (2022). Alasan Pelanggaran Maksim Cara/Pelaksanaan dalam Prinsip Kerja Sama Grice pada Budaya Masayarakat Riau. Sintaks, 2(2).
Ningsih, S. &. (2023). Kesantunan Berbahasa Warganet dalam Kolom Komentar Instagram @Jokowi ‘Ruang Cakap Digital. Konfiks: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra & Pengajaran, 10(1).
Putri, D. N. (2016). Prinsip Kerja Sama dalam Acara Mata Najwa Pada Tema Berburu Tahta Daerah di Stasiun Televisi Metro Tv. Bandung: Angkasa.
Setiawan, A., Basuki, R., & Rahayu, N. (2017). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama Percakapan Dalam Acara Mata Najwa Di Metro TV. Jurnal Ilmiah KORPUS, 1(1), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v1i1.3121
Sofiana, Hermaliza dan. (2021). Pelanggaran Prinsip
Kerja Sama dalam Debat Pemilihan Umum Calon Presiden 2019. J-LELC, 1.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R dan D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tarigan, H. Guntur. (2015). Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Wijana, D. P. (1996). Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Bandung: Andi.
Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Bandung: Pustaka Belajar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)


2.png)











