ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ON SOFT CLAY SOIL STABILIZATION AS A SUBGRADE IN BINJAI – PANGKALAN BRANDAN TOLL ROAD PROJECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/jipe.3.1.2024.24-29Keywords:
soft soil, PVD preloading, PVD vacuum, piled embankment, eenvironmentally friendlyAbstract
Soft soil poses significant challenges in road construction projects, particularly in the Binjai - Pangkalan Brandan Toll Road, where non-uniform settlement of landfills has been observed. To address these issues and achieve the desired subgrade quality and compression, various soft soil stabilization methods have been employed, including mechanical approaches such as Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) with preloading or vacuum and Pile Embankment. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impact of these three stabilization methods using the Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) method. Primary data was collected through interviews with experts from diverse stakeholders, including academics, planning consultants, and implementing contractors, using the purposive sampling technique. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted to develop SWOT strategies for each repair method based on environmental assessment indicators derived from literature studies. The SWOT analysis results indicate that the PVD Preloading method is the most environmentally friendly among the three methods. This is attributed to the absence of cement usage, lower electrical energy consumption, and the use of more environmentally friendly materials. Although PVD Preloading requires additional backfill for the preloading process, the impact on the environment is minimal, as the soil material used comes from the project site, and approximately 90% of the backfill is returned as road backfill after the consolidation process is complete. The analysis also reveals that the speed of the consolidation process is inversely proportional to its environmental friendliness.
References
H. C. Hardiyatmo, Soil Mechanics I, 7th edition. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2019.
Okyay, U. S., & Dias, D. (2010). Use of lime and cement treated soils as pile supported load transfer platform. Engineering Geology, 114(1-2), 34-44.
I. N. Sinarta, A. Rifa, T. F. Fathani, and W. Wilopo, "Spatial Analysis of Safety Factors due to Rain Infiltration in the Buyan-Beratan Ancient Mountains," vol. 11, no. March, pp. 90–97, 2020.
Puppala, A. J., & Cerato, A. (2009). Heave distress problems in chemically-treated sulfate-laden materials. Geo-Strata—Geo Institute of ASCE, 10(2), 28-32.
Puppala, A. J., Saride, S., & Williammee, R. (2012). Sustainable reuse of limestone quarry fines and RAP in pavement base/subbase layers. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24(4), 418-429.
D. Panguriseng, "Fundamentals of Soil Improvement Techniques," AQ Library, no. August, p. 240, 2017.
H. C. Hardiyatmo, Geosynthetics for Highway Engineering, 2nd edition. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2017.
Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Kelly, R., & Buys, H. (2012). Soft soil foundation improved by vacuum and surcharge loading. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement, 165(2), 87-96.
W. I. Ervianto, B. W. Soemardi, M. Abduh, and D. Surjamanto, "Study of Green Construction Aspects in Infrastructure Project Development," pp. 1–12, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://www.dephub.go.id/.
W. I. Ervianto, "GREEN CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION AS AN EFFORT TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA Wulfram I. Ervianto 1," Makal. Konf. Nas. Wahana Tech Forum. 2nd, 2015.
I. M. K. Wiranata and I. N. Sinarta, "CONSOLIDATION ANALYSIS AND SAFE NUMBER VALUE IN SOFT CLAY STABILIZATION EFFORTS WITH PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAIN (PVD)," no. November, pp. 16–17, 2023.
Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215-251.
Suyitno, Qualitative Research Methods: Their Concept, Principles, and Operations. 2018.
P. D. Sugiyono, Statistics for Research. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Y. Afiyanti, "Focus Group Discussion as a Method of Qualitative Research Data Collection," J. Indonesian Nursing., Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 58–62, 2008, doi: 10.7454/jki.v12i1.201.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).




