ANALYSIS OF DEVIATION BEHAVIOR IN THE SMAN 2 ABIANSEMAL BUILDING WITH THE SRPMK SYSTEM AND FLAT SLAB

Authors

  • I Made Dwi Permana Putra Department of Civil Engineering Warmadewa University
  • Ni Komang Ayu Agustini Department of Civil Engineering Warmadewa University
  • I Gusti Agung Putu Eryani Department of Civil Engineering Warmadewa University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/jipe.4.1.2025.39-44

Keywords:

flat slab, SRPMK, displacement, inter-story drift

Abstract

The development of educational infrastructure in seismically active regions demands structural systems that ensure both safety and functionality. This study evaluates the structural performance of the SMAN 2 Abiansemal building by comparing two structural systems: the conventional Special Moment Resisting Frame (SRPMK) and a flat slab system with drop panels. Finite element analysis using ETABS and dynamic response spectrum methods, as stipulated in SNI 1726:2019, was employed to assess inter-story drift and total displacement. The SRPMK system demonstrated stable behavior, with maximum drift values remaining below the permissible limit of 62.77 mm. In contrast, the flat slab system initially exceeded this threshold due to its lower lateral stiffness. A design revision increasing the column dimensions from 45×45 cm to 50×50 cm successfully reduced the drift values to compliant levels. Although the flat slab system requires dimensional adjustments, it offers architectural and construction benefits, making it a viable alternative for mid-rise educational buildings in seismic-prone areas. The study emphasizes the importance of dynamic drift analysis and early-stage design validation when adopting beamless slab configurations in earthquake-sensitive zones.

References

[1] J. Putri, M. Pratama, and U. Sari, "Embodied carbon analysis on multi-story building using flat slab and conventional slab system," E3S Web Conf., vol. 445, p. 01037, 2023, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344501037.

[2] R. Ramadhan, A. Rahmawati, and W. Warsito, "Analysis of dimensional and calculations structure designed based on SNI 2847-2013," J. Innov. Civ. Eng. (JICE), vol. 2, no. 1, p. 153, 2021, doi: 10.33474/jice.v2i1.1127.

[3] G. Tunç, A. Azizi, and T. Tanfener, "Effects of slab types on the seismic behavior and construction cost of RC buildings," Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 553–567, 2023, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.971343.

[4] R. Pradhana, M. Pratama, E. Santoso, and A. Karjanto, "Structural performance of multi-storey building using flat slab and conventional slab to seismic loads (case study: Faculty Building of Sport Science in Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia)," IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 669, no. 1, p. 012053, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/669/1/012053.

[5] A. Thakur and R. John, "Use of flat slabs in multi-storey commercial building," Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 563–568, 2019, doi: 10.33564/ijeast.2019.v04i03.086.

[6] J. Liu and H. Zhang, "Common design problems and optimization measures for flat slab floor structures," E3S Web Conf., vol. 143, p. 01033, 2020, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202014301033.

[7] N. P. I. Maulana, I. N. Sinarta, and I. W. G. E. Triswandana, "Deflection of flat slab-drop panel in the G2 building at Warmadewa University," J. Infrastruct. Plan. Eng., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 27–32, 2023, doi: 10.22225/jipe.2.2.2023.27-32.

[8] A. Saputra and E. Pangestuti, "Perbandingan flat slab dengan pelat konvensional terhadap pengaruh beban lateral," Citizen J. Ilm. Multidisiplin Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 84–93, 2023, doi: 10.53866/jimi.v3i2.241.

[9] D. N. M. D. Cahyana, I. N. Sinarta, and I. P. E. Sarassantika, "The design of the flat slab system with drop panel in the Sukawati market building," J. Infrastruct. Plan. Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 75–80, 2022, doi: 10.22225/jipe.1.2.2022.75-80.

[10] A. Afifi et al., "Punching capacity of UHPC post-tensioned flat slabs with and without shear reinforcement: An experimental study," Civ. Eng. J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 567–582, 2023, doi: 10.28991/cej-2023-09-03-06.

[11] B. Abdulrahman, Z. Wu, and L. Cunningham, "Experimental and numerical investigation into strengthening flat slabs at corner columns with externally bonded CFRP," Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 139, pp. 132–147, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.056.

[12] N. Mellios and P. Spyrdis, "Data cleansing and overfitting check for interpretable ML in concrete design – a punching shear paradigm," CE/Papers, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1110–1118, 2023, doi: 10.1002/cepa.2057.

[13] R. Prasad et al., "Design and analysis of a G+5 residential building using ETABS and comparing between conventional slabs and flat slabs," Int. J. Prog. Res. Eng. Manag. Sci., 2023, doi: 10.58257/ijprems31289.

[14] Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 1726:2019 – Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non-Gedung, Jakarta: BSN, 2019.

[15] Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 1727:2020 – Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain, Jakarta: BSN, 2020.

[16] Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 2847:2019 – Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan, Jakarta: BSN, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles