Comparative analysis of cost and time for beam, slab, and column formwork using conventional and aluminum formwork methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/jipe.5.1.2026.33-42Keywords:
conventional formwork, aluminum formwork, cost, timeAbstract
The development of the construction industry in Indonesia has accelerated urbanization and population growth, demanding the implementation of efficient construction methods, particularly in the development of high-rise buildings that optimize both cost and project duration. In reinforced concrete construction, formwork plays a significant role in determining the overall cost and time of the construction project. Therefore, this study analysis the comparison of cost and time for formwork work on columns, beams, and slabs in the BSI Tower project. Conventional formwork, typically made of wood, is still widely used due to its relatively low initial cost and flexibility. However, this method has several drawbacks, including material waste, low durability, high labour intensity, long processing time, inconsistent concrete surface quality, and a short service life, which lead to higher maintenance and replacement costs. In contrast, aluminum formwork is lightweight, precise, and reusable. This research employs a quantitative approach and utilizes Microsoft Project software. Cost analysis is conducted by multiplying the work volume by unit prices obtained from the 2024 Jakarta Standard Unit Price Analysis (AHSP) and project documentation, while time analysis is developed through Microsoft Project to estimate the duration of formwork installation and removal from floors 14 to 22. The results indicate that aluminum formwork is more efficient than conventional formwork in terms of both cost and time. The total cost of the aluminum formwork system was IDR 6,262,395,602, while the total cost of the conventional formwork system was IDR 6,509,110,236. This indicates that the aluminum formwork system is more economical, with a cost reduction of IDR 246,714,634, equivalent to approximately 3.79% compared to the conventional formwork system. Regarding time, aluminum formwork requires 63 days to complete, whereas conventional formwork takes 108 days, resulting in a time saving of 45 days. This research provides a data-driven framework to assist contractors in optimizing project scheduling and cost budgeting when transitioning from conventional formwork to aluminum formwork systems.
References
[1] I. Basari, “Estimasi Risiko Proyek High Rise Building Pada Kontraktor,” pp. 1–72, 2017.
[2] K. A. Virendra and K. Paul, “Comparison of aluminum and tunnel formwork for high rise construction,” Discover Civil Engineering, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44290-025-00236-6.
[3] N. M. J. Suarmini, I. W. G. E. Triswandana, and K. W. Candrayana, “Performance Analysis Of The Warmadewa Educational Hospital Building Construction Project,” Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.22225/jipe.3.2.2024.63-68.
[4] E. Wahyuni, I. W. Jawat, N. Made, and W. Pratiwi, “Re-planning schedule and costs on the Balimed Denpasar hospital building development project,” vol. 2, pp. 7–20, 2023.
[5] I. G. Agung, G. Jaya, I. N. Sinarta, N. Komang, and A. Agustini, “Study of the application green construction in testing the functional feasibility of main praja office the regional secretariat of Denpasar city,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2024.
[6] A. D. Wiguna and C. M. Sujana, “Comparisonal Analysis of Formwork Costs Conventional , Semi- System and Aluminium on Shear Wall Work ( Case Study?: The Building of The Faculty of Art and Design Education ),” vol. 02075, 2023.
[7] R. Hangarge, A. Waghmare, and S. Patil, “Comparison of Conventional , Aluminium and Tunnel Formwork Distribution of Constrution cost,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 176–181, 2017.
[8] I. N. Widjaya, R Yehezkiel, Putra, “Multidisciplinary Science Comparative Analysis of Aluminum Formwork and Conventional Formwork on the Success of the Structural Work Quality,” vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 755–765, 2024.
[9] B. Wani, “Analysis Of New Formwork Technology Adopted On A Construction Site In Pune,” vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 11–15, 2017.
[10] R. A. S. A B Putra, G A Sentosa, “Cost Analysis and Method Comparison on High- Rise Building Column Formworks by Three Formwork Methods Cost Analysis and Method Comparison on High-Rise Building Column Formworks by Three Formwork Methods”, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012007.
[11] D. J. Mistry, A. D. Raval, and J. R. Pitroda, “Comparative Analysis of Conventional Formwork with Specialized Emerging Formwork Regarding Project Engineering Factors for High-rise Building,” vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2021.
[12] A. S. Supriyono, I. N. D. Pahang Putra, and B. Trigunarsyah, “Comparative Analysis of Formwork Systems: Cost Efficiency and Time Management in Construction Projects,” Advance Sustainable Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2025, doi: 10.26877/asset.v7i2.1320.
[13] Kendre C. and Bhamare T., “Comparison between Aluminium and Conventional Formwork Based of Cost and Time,” International Journal of Research Engineering, Science and Management, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 71–73, 2024.
[14] P. Oktavia, I. Ketut Sucita, K. Kunci, B. Aluminium, and H. Sewa, Biaya, “Biaya Sewa Bekisting Metode Sistem Penuh Dengan Material Aluminium,” Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, pp. 2715–5668, 2020.
[15] N. B. Patekar and A. F. Shaikh, “Assessing the impact of conventional formwork and Mivan formwork on construction productivity and efficiency,” 2023.
[16] F. Putra, A. Andreas, and N. Plamonia, “Analisis Biaya, Mutu, Waktu Pada Bekisting Multipleks Dengan Phenolic Untuk Pekerjaan Kolom Dan Balok,” Jurnal ARTESIS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 153–161, 2022, doi: 10.35814/artesis.v2i2.4297.
[17] A. Kazi and F. Parkar, “Comparative Study And Decision Making For A Formwork Technique To Be Adopted On A Construction Site In Mumbai,” pp. 1–6, 2015.
[18] E. Agriansyah, E. A. Suryo, and E. Arifi, “Comparison of Formwork use in Building X Project in Surabaya City,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 146–154, 2023, doi: 10.21776/civense.v6i2.411.
[19] M. D. V Lawdy, E. Arifi, M. Narto, and B. Krisnawan, “MethodsX On the methodology of conventional and semi-system formwork project comparison,” MethodsX, vol. 13, no. April, p. 102824, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102824.
[20] D. K. Donkor and S. Mahamud, “Comparative Assessment of Formwork Systems used in Construction Projects in the Tamale Metropolis of Northern Ghana,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 44–50, 2022.
[21] A. Sudarjanto, R. Samiono, and Z. Salsabilla, “Analisis Perbandingan Bekisting Konvensional Dan Bekisting Aluminium Terhadap Biaya Dan Waktu Pada Proyek Anwa Residence Apartement,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. XI, no. 2, pp. 44–55, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Matildah Pretty Putri Alkassa, Sudarno P Tampubolon, Agnes Sri Mulyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
