VALIDATION CONTROL IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF WIDE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTIONS USING CONCRETE DAMAGE PLASTICITY UNDER CYCLIC LOADING

Authors

  • Putu Ayu Priska Dewi Magister of Civil Engineering Udayana University
  • I Ketut Sudarsana Department of Civil Engineering Udayana University
  • I Gede Adi Susila Department of Civil Engineering Udayana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/jipe.4.1.2025.1-9

Keywords:

concrete damage plasticity, validation control, finite element analysis, wide beam-column connection, cyclic loading

Abstract

This study investigates the validation of a finite element model for exterior wide beam–column connections using the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) approach under reversed cyclic loading. The research focuses on identifying optimal CDP parameters—mesh size, dilation angle, and viscosity—through a structured trial-and-error process to enhance simulation accuracy. Using the SPWWS specimen as a benchmark, the final model configuration (40 mm mesh, 40° dilation angle, and 0.005 viscosity) produced peak load errors of 3.47% (positive) and 8.73% (negative) compared to experimental data. The simulation also replicated key damage mechanisms including diagonal, flexural, and torsional cracking observed in the laboratory test. These results validate the effectiveness of the calibrated CDP model in capturing both global and local nonlinear behaviors of RC joints under seismic loading. The validated model offers a reliable basis for future studies on reinforced concrete joints under modified loading conditions or strengthening interventions.

References

[1] A. Pakzad and M. Khanmohammadi, “Experimental cyclic behavior of code-conforming exterior wide beam-column connections,” Engineering Structures, vol. 214, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110613.

[2] H. Behnam, J. S. Kuang, and B. Samali, “Parametric finite element analysis of RC wide beam-column connections,” Computers and Structures, vol. 205, pp. 28–44, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.04.004.

[3] V. V. S. and N. Mohan, “Exterior Type-2 Wide Beam-Column Connection: An Overview,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 200–206, 2020.

[4] Badan Standardisasi Nasional, SNI 2847:2019 – Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019.

[5] ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, 2019.

[6] ACI Committee 352, Recommendations for Design of Beam-Column Connections in Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Structures (ACI 352R-02), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2002.

[7] R. Y. C. Huang and J. S. Kuang, “Predicting strength of exterior wide beam–column joints for seismic resistance,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, vol. 146, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002488.

[8] G. Santarsiero and A. Masi, “Key mechanisms of the seismic behaviour of external RC wide beam–column joints,” The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, vol. 13, pp. 36–51, 2019, doi: 10.2174/1874836801913010036.

[9] R. Y. C. Huang, J. S. Kuang, and H. Behnam, “Shear strength of exterior wide beam-column joints with different beam reinforcement ratios,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2018, doi: 10.1080/13632469.2018.1545711.

[10] H. Behnam and J. S. Kuang, “Exterior RC wide beam–column connections: Effect of spandrel beam on seismic behavior,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, vol. 144, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001995.

[11] S. H. Luk and J. S. Kuang, “Seismic performance and force transfer of wide beam–column joints in concrete buildings,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering and Computational Mechanics, vol. 170, no. EM2, pp. 71–88, 2017, doi: 10.1680/jencm.15.00024.

[12] E. Etemadi and T. Vincent, “Mechanical behavior of RC exterior wide beam–column joints under lateral loading: A parametric computational study,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2003–2012, 2018, doi: 10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i3/1709030153.

[13] H. Behnam, J. S. Kuang, and Q. Huang, “Reinforced concrete exterior wide and conventional beam-column joints under earthquake-type loading,” 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16WCEE), Santiago, Chile, 2017.

[14] G. Santarsiero and A. Masi, “Finite element analysis of external RC wide beam–column joints provided with different detailing solutions,” in COMPDYN 2017 – 6th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece, 2017, doi: 10.7712/120117.5699.17312.

[15] E. Etemadi and K. Fallahnezhad, “Behavior of reinforced concrete interior wide beam–column connections under lateral loading: A finite element study,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2559–2570, 2017, doi: 10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i3/1709030061.

[16] E. Etemadi and T. Vincent, “Mechanical behavior of RC exterior wide beam–column joints under lateral loading: A parametric computational study,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2003–2012, 2017, doi: 10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i3/1709030153.

[17] M. Hafezolghorani, F. Hejazi, R. Vaghei, M. S. Jaafar, and K. Karimzade, “Simplified damage plasticity model for concrete,” Structural Engineering International, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2017, doi: 10.2749/101686616X1081.

[18] J. S. Kuang, H. Behnam, and Q. Huang, “Effective beam width of reinforced-concrete wide beam–column connections,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Structures and Buildings, 2017, doi: 10.1680/jstbu.15.00124.

[19] I. W. M. Andreasnata, I. N. Sinarta, N. K. Armaeni, I. P. E. Sarassantika, D. T. Trung, C. B. Casita, R. Sulaksitaningrum, and S. P. Tampubolon, “Column structure strengthening with FRP due to story addition,” Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Engineering (JIPE), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–45, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.22225/jipe.1.1.2022.38-45.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles