Jurisdictional Consequences of Government Administration Law on the Implementation of Duties and Authorities of the Financial Audit Agency

  • Nizam Burhanuddin Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Dwi Putri Cahyawati Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Keywords: Government Administration, Juridical Consequences, BPK

Abstract

In the perspective of administrative law, the existence of a state agency BPK is a manifestation of the existence of another form of power from state power, namely the power of supervision of state finances or power of inspection. In carrying out its duties and authorities to examine the management and responsibilities of state finances, BPK is often faced with problems that are closely related to the dynamics of law and legislation. Authority disputes, overlapping regulations, to technical matters related to inspection procedures are examples of some of these problems. Problems that have been and will continue to exist along with development developments that demand the birth of new legal dynamics that are increasingly complex. To the development of administrative law. Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration which applies to all government functions contained in Ministries and Institutions has juridical consequences from this to the implementation of government administration contained in BPK, thus regarding the delegation of authority from BPK to BPK Implementers must be clearly regulated in BPK's legal products.

References

Dian Puji Simatupang, disampaikan dalam Diskusi Terbatas di Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, Jakarta, 19 Januari 2017.

Hamdan Zoelva, disampaikan dalam Forum Diskusi “Menyikapi Dinamika Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Dan Wewenang Badan Pemeriksa Keuanganâ€, Pusdiklat BPK RI, 26 Oktober 2017.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

Made Jayantara, Kedudukan Hukum dan Fungsi Rekomendasi DPRD (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah) Dalam Penyelenggaraan Kewenangan Perizinan Oleh Pemerintah Daerah, Denpasar, Universitas Udayana, 2015.

Made Subawa, disampaikan dalam Diskusi Terbatas di Universitas Udayana, Bali, 20 Februari 2017.

Mahkamah Konstitusi, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 54/PUU-XII/12/2014, tanggal 22 September 2015.

Miftah Toha, disampaikan dalam Diskusi Terbatas di Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 24 Februari 2017.

Prajudi Atmosudirjo, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia, 1994.

Sukardi, dan Radian Salman, disampaikan dalam Diskusi Terbatas di Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, 20 Februari 2017.

Totok Soeprijanto, Sumber-sumber Kewenangan, Pusdiklat Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta, Kementerian Keuangan.

Yos Johan Utama, disampaikan dalam Diskusi Terbatas di Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 23 Februari 2017.

Published
2022-10-27
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 87 times
PDF downloaded = 127 times