The Weakness of State Administrative Law as a Catalyst for Corruption in Indonesia: A Juridical Perspective and Proposed Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22225/elg.7.2.2025.164-174Keywords:
State administrative law, corruption, juridical perspective, solutionsAbstract
From a juridical perspective, the weakness of the State Administrative Law (SAL) system can be regarded as one of the factors that facilitates the occurrence of corruption in Indonesia. The ambiguity of legal norms and the inadequacy of supervisory instruments within the framework of SAL create loopholes for the abuse of power by state officials, which ultimately harms the public interest. Corruption—essentially the misuse of public authority for personal or group gain—often thrives within an administrative system that lacks sufficient principles of efficiency, transparency, and accountability. Based on this premise, the focus of this study is directed toward two main legal issues related to investment governance in Bali Province: (1) How can a juridical perspective help in understanding the weakness of State Administrative Law as a trigger for corruption in Indonesia? and (2) What solutions can be proposed to address the weaknesses in State Administrative Law in order to prevent corruption in Indonesia? This study is doctrinal in nature and utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique involves the card system and employs a statutory approach, factual approach, and conceptual analysis approach. The findings of this research indicate that juridical approaches to combating corruption should not be limited to repressive measures or sanctions but must also include preventive and corrective strategies. This includes reforming the structure of administrative law, optimizing oversight mechanisms, and integrating administrative law principles into all aspects of government administration. Systemic efforts to strengthen State Administrative Law as part of an anti-corruption strategy must be implemented collaboratively and sustainably. These efforts include regulatory reform, institutional restructuring, and the reinforcement of integrity values and transparency principles in the execution of governmental functions.
References
A, Nursya. (2020). Beberapa bentuk perbuatan pelaku berkaitan dengan tindak pidana korupsi (Menurut Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi). CV. Alumgadan Mandiri.
Ardiansyah. (2022). Hukum administrasi negara: Fenomena hukum di ruang publik. Deepublish Publisher.
Asmara, G. (2025). Hukum administrasi negara. Rajawali Pers.
Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Firmansyah, V. Z., & Syam, F. (2021). Penguatan hukum administrasi negara pencegah praktik korupsi dalam penyelenggaraan birokrasi di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.817Inspektorat Kota Banda Aceh. (2024). Ayo kenali dan hindari 30 jenis korupsi ini! Diakses 4 Mei 2025 dari https://inspektorat.bandaacehkota.go.id/2024/05/13/ayo-kenali-dan-hindari-30-jenis-korupsi-ini/
Kartika, S. D., et al. (2015). Korupsi dan KPK dalam perspektif hukum, ekonomi, dan sosial. Pusat Pengkajian, Pengolahan Data dan Informasi (P3DI). Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI dan Azza Grafika.
Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. (2018). Pendidikan antikorupsi untuk perguruan tinggi.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia. (2006). Buku saku untuk memahami tindak pidana korupsi. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Marwiyah, S. (2020). Pengantar ilmu administrasi negara. Universitas Panca Marga.
Matitaputty, M. I., et al. (2024). Hukum administrasi negara. Widina Media Utama.
Pratama, I. P. A., et al. (2023). Legal protection for buildings with traditional architecture in the modern era of Bali. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 3(2), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i2.28073
Puspitaningrat, I. D. A. M., et al. (2024). Niet ontvankelijke verklaard dalam putusan. Jurnal Yustitia, 18(1).
Ramadhani, R., & Cahyani, M. G. (2023). Analisis peran hukum administrasi negara terhadap upaya pencegahan praktik korupsi dalam pemerintahan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH), 2(1).
Siregar, M. (2023). Antikorupsi. UWKS Press.
Sitepu, D. E. B. (2022). Anti corruption. Diakses 30 Mei 2025 dari https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil-sumut/baca-artikel/15780/Anti-Corruption.html
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif (Suatu tinjauan singkat). Rajawali Pers.
Subekti, R., et al. (2022). Buku Ajar Hukum Administrasi Negara. Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung (Grup CV. Widina Media Utama).
Suganda, R. (2022). Metode pendekatan yuridis dalam memahami sistem penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(3), 2859–2866. http://dx.doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485
Sumaryati, et al. (2019). Pendidikan antikorupsi dalam keluarga, sekolah dan masyarakat. UAD Press.
Wajdi, F., et al. (2024). Pengantar pendidikan antikorupsi (Teori, metode dan praktik). Widina Media Utama.
Wibowo, A., et al. (2022). Pengetahuan dasar antikorupsi dan integritas. CV. Media Sains Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anak Agung Gede Agung Indra Prathama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











