Just Execution with Permanent Legal Force

Authors

  • Anak Agung Ngurah Alit Wiraputra Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Yohanes I Wayan Suryadi Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/elg.7.2.2025.134-141

Keywords:

Execution, permanent legal force

Abstract

The execution of a civil case decision that has permanent legal force often experiences obstacles in its implementation, and is even difficult to implement. This is contrary to the principles of a simple, fast, and cost-efficient justice system, especially in the execution process. The applicant for execution, who hopes that his rights can be fulfilled by the respondent, is often burdened by high execution costs, even though the execution is carried out not due to the applicant's fault, but due to the respondent's unwillingness to voluntarily implement the decision. In this case, the aim is to analyze the regulation of the execution of civil case decisions that do not reflect justice, identify weaknesses in the implementation of the execution of civil cases that have permanent legal force, and provide a concept of justice-based execution reconstruction. The approach used in this study is normative juridical with a post-positivism paradigm, as well as through the approach of laws, concepts, comparisons, and cases. It can show that the current execution regulation does not provide a sense of justice, with the existence of legal uncertainty and problems in the execution procedure. Weaknesses in the legal substance in the HIR/RBg, as well as structural weaknesses and legal culture, are the main factors in the ineffectiveness of the execution of civil case decisions. Legal reconstruction includes changes to related articles in the HIR and the General Courts Law, as well as the establishment of a special institution that handles confiscation and execution. So that a fairer execution concept can be created and provide legal certainty for execution applicants.

References

Affandi, M. (1971). State sciences. Alumni.

Afandi, W. (1983). Judges and law in practice. Alumni.

Algra, N. E., et al. (1977). Dictionary of legal terms: Dutch-Indonesian. Binacipta.

Algra, N. B., et al. (1977). Dutch-Indonesian legal terms dictionary. Binacipta.

Admadja, K. K. (1985). The role and function of the legal profession in taxation law. In Paper in the Tax Law Seminar, IMNO-UN-PAD.

Abdulkadir, M. (1978). Indonesian civil procedure law. Alumni Publisher.

Abdulkadir, M. (2000). Indonesian civil procedure law. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Anselm, S., & Corbin, J. (n.d.). Basics of qualitative research. Pustaka Pelajar Offset.

Basiq, H. A. D. (2006). Religious courts in Indonesia. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Bambang, S., & Sujayadi. (2012). Introduction to civil procedure law and examples of litigation documents. Kencana Perdana Media Group.

Basuki, R. W. (2011). Legal reform with the face of justice. Varia Peradilan, Law Magazine, 27(313).

Bradly, D. E. (1986). Business and its legal environment. DC Heath and Company.

Civil Code.

Civil Procedure Code.

Darji, D., & Sidharta. (1999). The main points of legal philosophy: What and how Indonesian legal philosophy. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Darwan, P. (1996). Strategy for preparing and handling civil lawsuits. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Djazuli, B. (1987). Execution of civil case decisions: Legal aspects and law enforcement. Akademikan Pressindo.

Djuhaendah, H. (1996). Property guarantee institution for land and other objects attached to land in the concept of implementing the horizontal separation principle. PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Fernando, M. M. (2007). Achieving just law. Kompas.

Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2013). Dualism of normative and empirical legal research. Pustaka Pelajar.

Friedman, L. M. (n.d.). What is a legal system. University of Indonesia.

Harahap, M. Y. (1997). Several reviews on understanding the justice system and dispute resolution. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, M. Y. (1998a). Civil procedure law regarding lawsuits, trials, confiscation, evidence, and court decisions.

Harahap, M. Y. (1998b). Scope of execution problems in civil law. PT. Gramedia.

Hartono, S. (1982). What is the rule of law?. Alumni.

Hartono, S. (1991). Legal politics towards a national legal system. Alumni Publisher.

Hartono, S. (1996). History of the development of Indonesian law towards a national legal system. PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Huijbers, T. (1988). Philosophy of law in the cross-history. Kanisius.

Hutchinson, T. (2018). Researching and writing in law. Lawbookco.

Joeniarto. (1968). Principles of constitutional law. Gajah Mada Publishing Foundation.

Kusnadi, M., & Ibrahim, M. (n.d.). Introduction to Indonesian constitutional law (7th ed.). Center for Constitutional Law Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2002). Legal concepts in development. PT. Alumni.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2006). Legal concepts in development. Alumni.

Law No. 4 of 2004 concerning Justice.

Law No. 5 of 2004 concerning the Supreme Court.

Law No. 10 of 2009 concerning Tourism.

Leback, K. (2018). Theories of justice. Nusa Media Publisher.

Makarao, M. T. (1998). Principles of civil procedure law. PT. Rineka Cipta.

Mulyadi, L. (1999). Civil procedure law according to Indonesian judicial theory and practice. Djambatan.

Mulyadi, L. (2009). Judge's decision in Indonesian civil procedure law. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mertokusumo, S. (1970). History of the courts and legislation in Indonesia since 1942 and what is its benefit for us, the Indonesian nation (Dissertation).

Mertokusumo, S. (n.d.). Indonesian civil procedure law. Liberty.

Mertokusumo, S. (1979). Indonesian civil procedure law. Liberty Publisher.

Makarao, M. T. (1998). Principles of civil procedure law. PT. Rineka Cipta.

Pandoyo, T. (1981). Review of several provisions of the 1945 Constitution. Liberty.

Pasek, D. (1999). The limits of freedom of judicial power from the perspective of constitutional law (Dissertation). Law Study Program, Airlangga University.

Prodjodikoro, W. (1971). State law and politics (Oration at the 16th Anniversary, UNPAR).

Purwoto, S. G. (2002). Execution of civil case decisions. Academic Pressindo.

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Progressive law enforcement. Kompas.

Rawls, J. (1996). A theory of justice (rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.

Rasjidi, B. U. L. (1988). Philosophy of law: What is law. Remadja Karya.

Reksodiputro, M. (1999, October 12). National law seminar. Organized by the BPHN Department of Justice.

Rubini, & All, C. (1974). Introduction to civil procedure law. Alumni.

Sarwono. (2011). Civil procedure law: Theory and practice. Sinar Grafika Offset.

Setiawan. (1992). Various legal problems and civil procedure law. Alumni Publisher.

Soekanto, S. (1983). Introduction to legal research. UI Press.

Soekanto, S. (2008). Factors that influence law enforcement. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Soemadiningrat, O. S. (2002). Reconceptualization of contemporary customary law. PT Alumni.

Syahrani, R. (2004). Summary of the essence of legal science. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Subekti. (1977). Civil procedure law. BPHIN.

Subekti. (1989). Civil procedure law. Binacipta.

Wahjono, P. (1982). Republic of Indonesia. Rajawal Pers.

Wignyosoebroto, S. (1995). From colonial law to national law: A study of socio-political dynamics in the development of law for one and a half centuries in Indonesia (1840–1990). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles