The The Existence of Law Number 42 Of 1999 on The Execution of Object on Fiduciary Guarantees on Defaulted Debtors

Authors

  • Gatot Eko Yudhoyono Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
  • Unggul Basoeky Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/elg.7.1.11596.89-95

Keywords:

Fiduciary, Guarantee, Debtor, Default

Abstract

Fiduciary means the transfer of property rights based on trust, which gives the debtor a position to retain control of the collateral. The occurrence of fiduciary guarantees through encumbrance by making a notarial deed called the Fiduciary Guarantee Deed. If no settlement is made, direct execution will be carried out in accordance with the provisions of “Article 30 of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary”. This problem can be resolved through the implementation of court decisions in civil cases. The author in conducting research uses normative juridical research. The research is conducted by examining laws and regulations. Furthermore, the research conducts descriptive analysis through a qualitative approach. The results of the research show that if the debtor defaults, the execution of the fiduciary guaranteed object can be carried out in 3 ways, namely executorial execution, sale of the fiduciary guaranteed object under the authority of the fiduciary recipient through auction and sale under the hand. Factors affecting the execution of fiduciary guarantees include internal and external. Internal factors affecting execution are that the debtor does not understand the law, unilateral determination of default, not stipulated in the deed of agreement and the debtor does not voluntarily submit the object of collateral. Meanwhile, the external factors are that the fiduciary guaranteed deed is not registered by the leasing company, the fiduciary guaranteed certificate is not used as collateral.

References

Ahyani, S. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Melalui Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. Wawasan Yuridika, 24(1), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v24i1.19

Benuf., K & Azhar., M, (2020), Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer, Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504

Darma, Made B. A. K, Komang Febrinayanti D & Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 3(3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v3i3.32873

Debora, N. Manurung. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Terhadap Parate Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 2(3), 16-31

Dewi, E. T. (2024). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia: Analisis Konflik Norma dalam UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Invention: Journal Of Intellectual and Property Law, 1(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.70358/invention.v1i1.1248

Fathoni, R., Badriyah, S. M & R. Suharto. (2016). Efektivitas Pemberlakuan Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Secara Elektronik Terhadap Pembiayaan Bank Syariah (Studi pada Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah Artha Amanah Ummat Kabupaten Semarang). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12221

Feryantini, N. K. D, Komang Febrinayanti Dantes & Muhamad Jodi Setianto. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Menurut Undang-Undang Fidusia Nomor 42 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Komunikasi Yustisia, 5(1), 220-229. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v5i1.45944

Hernoko, A. Y. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Hudiyanto, Situmorang, R. L, Prasetyo, A., & Bari, R. F. (2018). Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Penguatan Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Penggunaan Jaminan Fidusia. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

Lodewijk., D. P, Santoso., A. P & Muftiyanto., T. N, (2024), Legal Protection for Debtors in the Execution of Fiduciary Security Objects in Indonesia, JIHAD: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi: 6(3), 256-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v3i1

Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Oktaviania, M dan Aminah. (2024). Upaya Hukum Kasasi Penipuan Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Persetujuan. Repertorium, 13(2), 134-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v13i2.3632

Olivia, Roma B. (2023). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021. Jurnal Darma Agung, 31(4), 1027-1035. https://dx.doi.org.10.46930/ojsuda.v31i4.3555

Prasnowo, A. D & Badriyah, S. M. (2019). Implementasi Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Baku. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 8(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p05

Raja., E. D. T. L et al. (2021). Eksekusi Benda Jaminan Fidusia: Analisis Konseptual Dalam Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 8(2), 132-150

Sipayung, Mardin & Iin Indriani. (2023). Legal Protection of Debtors on Forced Execution of Fiduciary Objects by Fiduciary Holders (Creditors) (Analysis of District Court Decision Number 61/Pdt.G/2021/PN. Srg). Jurnal Lex Specialis, 4(2), 348-366. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/jlsp/index

Soegianto, M. A. M, Diah Sulistyani RS & Zaenal Arifin. (2021). Klausula Baku Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank Perkreditan Rakyat. USM Law Review, 4(1), 208-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.3369

Subekti. (2014). Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Usanti, T. P dan Leonora Bakarbessy. (2014). Buku Referensi Hukum Perbankan. Surabaya: Revka Petra Media.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-26