Community Empowerment in Preventing Criminal Actions of Corruption in Sibetan Village, Bebandem District, Karangasem Regency

  • I Nyoman Putu Budiartha Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University, Denpasar
  • I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University, Denpasar
  • Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University, Denpasar
  • I Made Minggu Widyantara Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University, Denpasar
  • Ni Kadek Erika Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University, Denpasar
  • Putu Anggelita Putri Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University, Denpasar
  • Kadek Darmayanti Putri Faculty of Law, Warmadewa University, Denpasar
Keywords: Corruption, Prevent, Traditional Village, Village Credit, Institution

Abstract

The rise of corruption cases that occurred at the Village Credit Institution in Bali made the Sibetan village community worried, the same thing would happen in the Village Credit Institution of the Sibetan Traditional Village. Starting from that, community leaders of the Sibetan traditional village in collaboration with the Law Society of Warmadewa University organized cooperation in increasing public awareness. The study aim is to minimize corruption that is still found in Bali. Bali is famous for upholding a culture of law and order with the teachings of karma phala, it is means that whoever does the deed will receive the consequences of their actions. This happens because of a lack of knowledge about the law, especially corruption. The researcher used an empirical service method with the approach of local traditional institutions, in service to the field of corruption knowledge related to the rampant corruption in the Village Credit Institution in preventing corruption cases in the Village Credit Institution of Sibetan. The results show that there is a warm discussion in addressing corruption cases in Bali so that in the future it will not happen in the Sibetan Traditional Village.

References

Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Buku dalam Penulisan Pengertian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang(money laundering): Globalisasi dan Kejahatan Bisnis. Kencana.

Communication, S. (2015a). Laporan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara. Direktorat Pendidikan dan Pelayanan Masyarakat.

Communication, S. (2015b). Pengantar Gratifikasi. Direktorat Pendidikan dan Pelayanan Masyarakat.

Harun, M. H. (1991). Penyidik dan penuntut dalam proses pidana. PT RinekaCipta.

Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. ., & Barton, S. M. (2003). Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: what have they done, how often have they done it, who does it, and why did they do it. Electronic Journal of Sosiology.

Muhammad, R. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mulyadi, L. (2008). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana: Perspektif, Teoritis, dan Praktik. Alumni.

Rido, A. (1986). Badan Hukum dan Kedudukan badan Hukum bagi Perseroan, Perkumpulan, Koperasi, Yayasan, Wakaf. Alumni.

Sierra, J. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2008). Ethical Antecendents of Cheating Intentions: Evidence ofMediation. Journal Academic Ethics.

Subhandi, H. (2012). Pengertian Hukum Pidana Menurut Para Ahli. http://handarsubhandi.blogspot.com/2012/06/hukum-pidana.html. [28 Desember 2019]

Published
2022-07-31
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 23 times
PDF downloaded = 21 times