Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan

  • Kadek Cinthya Dwi Lestari Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali
  • I Nyoman Putu Budiartha Faculty of Law, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali
  • Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali
Keywords: Fiduciary Guarantee, Registration, Object of Fiduciary Guarantee

Abstract

Abstract—In accordance with the provisions in the Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the object of fiduciary guarantee must be registered at the fiduciary registration office, but in practice there are still many who do not register it. “The Loss of the Unregistered Fiduciary Object” has the formulation of the problem as a result of the legal guarantee dispute resolution effort the loss of unregistered fiduciary collateral objects. This research method uses mixed legal research method. In this type of legal research, combining between norm-based events and actual occurrences can be conclude that no fiduciary collateral results in the creditor not having preferential rights and executorial title rights in the case of destruction, the object of human guarantee can be resolve by litigation and non-litigation. This method combines the implementation of normative legal provisions (laws) in its action on certain legal events that occur in a society. After conducting this analysis, it can be concluded that the failure to register a fiduciary guarantee causes the creditor not to have preferential rights and executorial title rights. In the event that the destruction of the object of fiduciary guarantee can be resolve by means of litigation and non-litigation. At BPR Artha Bali Jaya, the settlement is carried out by non-litigation, namely by means of family or mediation, where if the debtor continues to pay the remaining credit, the lost object is not dispute. And to further reduce risk BPR Artha Bali Jaya asks debtors to replace lost collateral objects by pledging other objects of the same value.

 

Author Biography

I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, Faculty of Law, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Bali

References

Akhsin, M. H., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2017). Akibat Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Menurut Uu Nomor 42 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Akta, 4(3), 485–500. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i3.1825

Isnaeni, M. (2016). Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan: Eksistensi, Fungsi, dan Pengaturan. Yogyakarta: Laks Bank Pressindo.

Kamelo, H. T. (2004). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan. Bandung: Alumni.

Kholidin, M. (2005). Problematika Eksekusi Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan. Yogyakarta: Laks Bank Pressindo.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Manurung, M. A. M., & Hafidz, J. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditor Apabila Objek Jaminan Fidusia Ternyata Hilang dan Debitor Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus di PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Dinamika Bangun Arta Salatiga). Jurnal Akta, 4(1), 37–40. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i1.1554

Rahardjo, S. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sutarno. (2009). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perkreditan Pada Bank. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan

Undang-Undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia

Published
2020-11-20
Abstract viewed = 60 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 52 times